llmrun

C4ai Command R Plus 08 2024 — Benchmarks

Benchmark scores for C4ai Command R Plus 08 2024 aggregated from public leaderboards (5 boards), with how it ranks among open models and how it compares with its nearest neighbours. See hardware requirements for what you need to run it.

No llmrun Composite Score for C4ai Command R Plus 08 2024: the score is only published for a model measured on at least 4 of the boards in the score panel, spanning at least 2 benchmark categories and including a reasoning or coding board — or on 3 boards that narrow its score to a 90% range of at most 15.6 points. Either way the results must come from at least two different benchmarks. Its individual scores below stand on their own — see how the llmrun Composite Score gets calculated.

C4ai Command R Plus 08 2024 reasoning benchmarks

Multi-step logic and problem-solving — can the model think through a hard problem rather than recall an answer.

  • SimpleBench

    17.4%

    median 40.8%open leader 61.1%

    Overall best: Claude Fable 5 Max 81.9%

    lowest · #25 of 25 open · #100 of 101 all

    Independent

    Epoch AI ·

  • DTBench

    54.9%

    median 68.7%open leader 93.9%

    Overall best: Claude Opus 5.5 Max 98.9%

    19th percentile · #57 of 70 open · #203 of 235 all

    Lab-reported

    Epoch AI ·

  • LMCA

    5.0%

    median 25.5%open leader 55.5%

    Overall best: Claude Sonnet 5.5 Max 68.3%

    4th percentile · #54 of 56 open · #195 of 197 all

    Lab-reported

    Epoch AI ·

C4ai Command R Plus 08 2024 knowledge benchmarks

Breadth and depth of factual knowledge across many subjects, paired with the reasoning to apply it.

  • MMLU

    69.4%

    median 62.5%open leader 87.2%

    Overall best: GPT 4o (Nov 20, 2024) 88.1%

    67th percentile · #29 of 85 open · #63 of 136 all

    Lab-reported

    Epoch AI ·

C4ai Command R Plus 08 2024 instruction following benchmarks

How precisely a model obeys explicit, verifiable instructions — format, length, and content constraints — and, more broadly, how much people prefer its responses head-to-head in blind human voting.

  • LMArena Text

    1276.3

    median 1321.4open leader 1488.2

    Overall best: Gemini 4 Carbon (High) 1527.5

    36th percentile · #121 of 188 open · #299 of 408 all

    Arena

    Arena ·

Scores aggregated from public benchmark sources (Epoch AI: 4 boards, Arena: 1 board) — each linked from the benchmark pages. llmrun does not run these benchmarks. Percentiles and ranks are among open models in the llmrun catalogue; the median and leader marks refer to the same field.