llmrun

Llama 2 13B Chat HF — Benchmarks

Benchmark scores for Llama 2 13B Chat HF aggregated from public leaderboards (5 boards), with how it ranks among open models and how it compares with its nearest neighbours. See hardware requirements for what you need to run it.

No llmrun Composite Score for Llama 2 13B Chat HF: the score is only published for a model measured on at least 4 of the boards in the score panel, spanning at least 2 benchmark categories and including a reasoning or coding board — or on 3 boards that narrow its score to a 90% range of at most 15.6 points. Either way the results must come from at least two different benchmarks. Its individual scores below stand on their own — see how the llmrun Composite Score gets calculated.

Llama 2 13B Chat HF reasoning benchmarks

Multi-step logic and problem-solving — can the model think through a hard problem rather than recall an answer.

  • DTBench

    42.2%

    median 68.7%open leader 93.9%

    Overall best: Claude Opus 5.5 Max 98.9%

    1st percentile · #69 of 70 open · #234 of 235 all

    Lab-reported

    Epoch AI ·

Other results (1)

Leaderboard-only, not part of the llmrun Score

  • BIG-Bench Hard

    58.2%

    median 50.8%open leader 87.5%

    Overall best: Gemini 1.5 Pro 001 89.2%

    68th percentile · #13 of 38 open · #19 of 50 all

    Lab-reported

    Epoch AI ·

Llama 2 13B Chat HF math benchmarks

Symbolic and quantitative problem-solving, from competition math to multi-step calculation.

  • GSM8K

    36.9%

    median 52.3%open leader 94.5%

    39th percentile · #38 of 62 open · #54 of 93 all

    Lab-reported

    Epoch AI ·

Llama 2 13B Chat HF knowledge benchmarks

Breadth and depth of factual knowledge across many subjects, paired with the reasoning to apply it.

  • MMLU

    50.9%

    median 62.5%open leader 87.2%

    Overall best: GPT 4o (Nov 20, 2024) 88.1%

    27th percentile · #62 of 85 open · #108 of 136 all

    Lab-reported

    Epoch AI ·

Llama 2 13B Chat HF instruction following benchmarks

How precisely a model obeys explicit, verifiable instructions — format, length, and content constraints — and, more broadly, how much people prefer its responses head-to-head in blind human voting.

  • LMArena Text

    1141.5

    median 1321.4open leader 1488.2

    Overall best: Gemini 4 Carbon (High) 1527.5

    9th percentile · #172 of 188 open · #376 of 408 all

    Arena

    Arena ·

Scores aggregated from public benchmark sources (Epoch AI: 4 boards, Arena: 1 board) — each linked from the benchmark pages. llmrun does not run these benchmarks. Percentiles and ranks are among open models in the llmrun catalogue; the median and leader marks refer to the same field.