42dot LLM PLM 1.3B vs DeepSWE Preview
Side-by-side comparison of VRAM requirements, quantization, context length, and hardware compatibility.
Specifications
| 42dot LLM PLM 1.3B | DeepSWE Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 1.4B | 32.8B |
| Context | 4K | 41K |
| Architecture | LlamaForCausalLM | Qwen3ForCausalLM |
| License | CC BY-NC 4.0 | MIT |
| Downloads | 1.1K | 1.3K |
| Released | Feb 2024 | Jul 2025 |
VRAM by Quantization: 42dot LLM PLM 1.3B vs DeepSWE Preview
| Quantization | Bits | 42dot LLM PLM 1.3B VRAM | DeepSWE Preview VRAM |
|---|---|---|---|
| BF16 | 16.00 | 3.6 GB | 66.2 GB |
Verdict
42dot LLM PLM 1.3B needs less VRAM at BF16 (3.6 GB vs 66.2 GB), so it fits on smaller GPUs. DeepSWE Preview supports a longer context window (41K tokens). DeepSWE Preview is the more widely downloaded of the two.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Which needs less VRAM, 42dot LLM PLM 1.3B or DeepSWE Preview?
At BF16, 42dot LLM PLM 1.3B needs 3.6 GB and DeepSWE Preview needs 66.2 GB, so 42dot LLM PLM 1.3B is the lighter option to run locally.
- Which has a longer context window, 42dot LLM PLM 1.3B or DeepSWE Preview?
42dot LLM PLM 1.3B supports 4,096 tokens and DeepSWE Preview supports 40,960 tokens.
- What is the difference between 42dot LLM PLM 1.3B and DeepSWE Preview?
42dot LLM PLM 1.3B is a 1.4B model from 42dot, while DeepSWE Preview is a 32.8B model from agentica-org. Compare their VRAM requirements above to see which fits your GPU or Mac.