42dot LLM PLM 1.3B vs Amber
Side-by-side comparison of VRAM requirements, quantization, context length, and hardware compatibility.
Specifications
| 42dot LLM PLM 1.3B | Amber | |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 1.4B | 6.7B |
| Context | 4K | 2K |
| Architecture | LlamaForCausalLM | LlamaForCausalLM |
| License | CC BY-NC 4.0 | Apache 2.0 |
| Downloads | 1.1K | 53.0K |
| Released | Feb 2024 | Oct 2025 |
VRAM by Quantization: 42dot LLM PLM 1.3B vs Amber
| Quantization | Bits | 42dot LLM PLM 1.3B VRAM | Amber VRAM |
|---|---|---|---|
| BF16 | 16.00 | 3.6 GB | 14.8 GB |
Verdict
42dot LLM PLM 1.3B needs less VRAM at BF16 (3.6 GB vs 14.8 GB), so it fits on smaller GPUs. 42dot LLM PLM 1.3B supports a longer context window (4K tokens). Amber is the more widely downloaded of the two.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Which needs less VRAM, 42dot LLM PLM 1.3B or Amber?
At BF16, 42dot LLM PLM 1.3B needs 3.6 GB and Amber needs 14.8 GB, so 42dot LLM PLM 1.3B is the lighter option to run locally.
- Which has a longer context window, 42dot LLM PLM 1.3B or Amber?
42dot LLM PLM 1.3B supports 4,096 tokens and Amber supports 2,048 tokens.
- What is the difference between 42dot LLM PLM 1.3B and Amber?
42dot LLM PLM 1.3B is a 1.4B model from 42dot, while Amber is a 6.7B model from LLM360. Compare their VRAM requirements above to see which fits your GPU or Mac.