Smol Llama 101M GQA vs Llama Guard 3 1B
Side-by-side comparison of VRAM requirements, quantization, context length, and hardware compatibility.
Specifications
| Smol Llama 101M GQA | Llama Guard 3 1B | |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 101M | 1.5B |
| Context | 1K | — |
| Architecture | LlamaForCausalLM | — |
| License | Apache 2.0 | llama3.2 |
| Downloads | 1.9K | 44.9K |
| Released | Dec 2025 | Sep 2024 |
VRAM by Quantization: Smol Llama 101M GQA vs Llama Guard 3 1B
| Quantization | Bits | Smol Llama 101M GQA VRAM | Llama Guard 3 1B VRAM |
|---|---|---|---|
| BF16 | 16.00 | 0.5 GB | 3.3 GB |
Verdict
Smol Llama 101M GQA needs less VRAM at BF16 (0.5 GB vs 3.3 GB), so it fits on smaller GPUs. Llama Guard 3 1B is the more widely downloaded of the two.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Which needs less VRAM, Smol Llama 101M GQA or Llama Guard 3 1B?
At BF16, Smol Llama 101M GQA needs 0.5 GB and Llama Guard 3 1B needs 3.3 GB, so Smol Llama 101M GQA is the lighter option to run locally.
- What is the difference between Smol Llama 101M GQA and Llama Guard 3 1B?
Smol Llama 101M GQA is a 101M model from BEE-spoke-data (Llama family), while Llama Guard 3 1B is a 1.5B model from Meta (Llama family). Compare their VRAM requirements above to see which fits your GPU or Mac.