Gemma 2 Mitra E vs Functiongemma 270M Ft Mobile Actions
Side-by-side comparison of VRAM requirements, quantization, context length, and hardware compatibility.
Specifications
| Gemma 2 Mitra E | Functiongemma 270M Ft Mobile Actions | |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 9.2B | 270M |
| Context | 8K | — |
| Architecture | Gemma2ForCausalLM | — |
| License | — | Gemma Terms |
| Downloads | 179 | 204 |
| Released | Mar 2026 | Jun 2026 |
VRAM by Quantization: Gemma 2 Mitra E vs Functiongemma 270M Ft Mobile Actions
| Quantization | Bits | Gemma 2 Mitra E VRAM | Functiongemma 270M Ft Mobile Actions VRAM |
|---|---|---|---|
| BF16 | 16.00 | 19.4 GB | 0.6 GB |
Verdict
Functiongemma 270M Ft Mobile Actions needs less VRAM at BF16 (0.6 GB vs 19.4 GB), so it fits on smaller GPUs. Functiongemma 270M Ft Mobile Actions is the more widely downloaded of the two.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Which needs less VRAM, Gemma 2 Mitra E or Functiongemma 270M Ft Mobile Actions?
At BF16, Gemma 2 Mitra E needs 19.4 GB and Functiongemma 270M Ft Mobile Actions needs 0.6 GB, so Functiongemma 270M Ft Mobile Actions is the lighter option to run locally.
- What is the difference between Gemma 2 Mitra E and Functiongemma 270M Ft Mobile Actions?
Gemma 2 Mitra E is a 9.2B model from buddhist-nlp (Gemma 2 family), while Functiongemma 270M Ft Mobile Actions is a 270M model from litert-community (Gemma 2 family). Compare their VRAM requirements above to see which fits your GPU or Mac.