Mixtral 34Bx2 MoE 60B vs TinyMixtral 4x248M MoE

Side-by-side comparison of VRAM requirements, quantization, context length, and hardware compatibility.

Mixtral 34Bx2 MoE 60B

cloudyu · 60.8B

Chat
TinyMixtral 4x248M MoE

Isotonic · 701M

Chat

Specifications

Mixtral 34Bx2 MoE 60BTinyMixtral 4x248M MoE
Parameters60.8B701M
Context200K33K
ArchitectureMixtralForCausalLMMixtralForCausalLM
LicenseApache 2.0Apache 2.0
Downloads8.2K2.5K
ReleasedJan 2026Apr 2024

VRAM by Quantization: Mixtral 34Bx2 MoE 60B vs TinyMixtral 4x248M MoE

QuantizationBitsMixtral 34Bx2 MoE 60B VRAMTinyMixtral 4x248M MoE VRAM
BF1616.00122.4 GB1.7 GB

Verdict

TinyMixtral 4x248M MoE needs less VRAM at BF16 (1.7 GB vs 122.4 GB), so it fits on smaller GPUs. Mixtral 34Bx2 MoE 60B supports a longer context window (200K tokens). Mixtral 34Bx2 MoE 60B is the more widely downloaded of the two.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which needs less VRAM, Mixtral 34Bx2 MoE 60B or TinyMixtral 4x248M MoE?

At BF16, Mixtral 34Bx2 MoE 60B needs 122.4 GB and TinyMixtral 4x248M MoE needs 1.7 GB, so TinyMixtral 4x248M MoE is the lighter option to run locally.

Which has a longer context window, Mixtral 34Bx2 MoE 60B or TinyMixtral 4x248M MoE?

Mixtral 34Bx2 MoE 60B supports 200,000 tokens and TinyMixtral 4x248M MoE supports 32,768 tokens.

What is the difference between Mixtral 34Bx2 MoE 60B and TinyMixtral 4x248M MoE?

Mixtral 34Bx2 MoE 60B is a 60.8B model from cloudyu (Mixtral family), while TinyMixtral 4x248M MoE is a 701M model from Isotonic (Mixtral family). Compare their VRAM requirements above to see which fits your GPU or Mac.