Cogito V1 Preview Qwen 32B vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Side-by-side comparison of VRAM requirements, quantization, context length, and hardware compatibility.
Specifications
| Cogito V1 Preview Qwen 32B | Qwen3 Coder Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 32B | 79.7B |
| Context | 131K | 262K |
| Architecture | Qwen2ForCausalLM | Qwen3NextForCausalLM |
| License | Apache 2.0 | Apache 2.0 |
| Downloads | 43.2K | 979.4K |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Feb 2026 |
VRAM by Quantization: Cogito V1 Preview Qwen 32B vs Qwen3 Coder Next
| Quantization | Bits | Cogito V1 Preview Qwen 32B VRAM | Qwen3 Coder Next VRAM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q2_K | 3.40 | 14.4 GB | 34.3 GB |
| Q3_K_M | 3.90 | 16.4 GB | 39.2 GB |
| Q3_K_S | 3.50 | 14.8 GB | 35.3 GB |
| Q4_0 | 4.00 | 16.8 GB | 40.2 GB |
| Q4_K_M | 4.80 | 20.0 GB | 48.2 GB |
| Q5_K_M | 5.70 | 23.6 GB | 57.2 GB |
| Q6_K | 6.60 | 27.2 GB | 66.1 GB |
| Q8_0 | 8.00 | 32.8 GB | 80.1 GB |
Verdict
Cogito V1 Preview Qwen 32B needs less VRAM at Q4_K_M (20.0 GB vs 48.2 GB), so it fits on smaller GPUs. Qwen3 Coder Next supports a longer context window (262K tokens). Qwen3 Coder Next is the more widely downloaded of the two.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Which needs less VRAM, Cogito V1 Preview Qwen 32B or Qwen3 Coder Next?
At Q4_K_M, Cogito V1 Preview Qwen 32B needs 20.0 GB and Qwen3 Coder Next needs 48.2 GB, so Cogito V1 Preview Qwen 32B is the lighter option to run locally.
- Which has a longer context window, Cogito V1 Preview Qwen 32B or Qwen3 Coder Next?
Cogito V1 Preview Qwen 32B supports 131,072 tokens and Qwen3 Coder Next supports 262,144 tokens.
- What is the difference between Cogito V1 Preview Qwen 32B and Qwen3 Coder Next?
Cogito V1 Preview Qwen 32B is a 32B model from deepcogito (Qwen family), while Qwen3 Coder Next is a 79.7B model from Alibaba (Qwen family). Compare their VRAM requirements above to see which fits your GPU or Mac.