Meta Llama 3 70B Instruct Abliterated V3.5 vs Bella Bartender 8B Llama3.1

Side-by-side comparison of VRAM requirements, quantization, context length, and hardware compatibility.

Specifications

Meta Llama 3 70B Instruct Abliterated V3.5Bella Bartender 8B Llama3.1
Parameters70.6B8.0B
Context8K131K
ArchitectureLlamaForCausalLMLlamaForCausalLM
LicenseLlama 3 CommunityLlama 3.1 Community
Downloads8.6K3.7K
ReleasedMay 2024Mar 2026

VRAM by Quantization: Meta Llama 3 70B Instruct Abliterated V3.5 vs Bella Bartender 8B Llama3.1

QuantizationBitsMeta Llama 3 70B Instruct Abliterated V3.5 VRAMBella Bartender 8B Llama3.1 VRAM
BF1616.00142.1 GB16.6 GB

Verdict

Bella Bartender 8B Llama3.1 needs less VRAM at BF16 (16.6 GB vs 142.1 GB), so it fits on smaller GPUs. Bella Bartender 8B Llama3.1 supports a longer context window (131K tokens). Meta Llama 3 70B Instruct Abliterated V3.5 is the more widely downloaded of the two.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which needs less VRAM, Meta Llama 3 70B Instruct Abliterated V3.5 or Bella Bartender 8B Llama3.1?

At BF16, Meta Llama 3 70B Instruct Abliterated V3.5 needs 142.1 GB and Bella Bartender 8B Llama3.1 needs 16.6 GB, so Bella Bartender 8B Llama3.1 is the lighter option to run locally.

Which has a longer context window, Meta Llama 3 70B Instruct Abliterated V3.5 or Bella Bartender 8B Llama3.1?

Meta Llama 3 70B Instruct Abliterated V3.5 supports 8,192 tokens and Bella Bartender 8B Llama3.1 supports 131,072 tokens.

What is the difference between Meta Llama 3 70B Instruct Abliterated V3.5 and Bella Bartender 8B Llama3.1?

Meta Llama 3 70B Instruct Abliterated V3.5 is a 70.6B model from failspy (Llama 3 family), while Bella Bartender 8B Llama3.1 is a 8.0B model from juiceb0xc0de (Llama 3 family). Compare their VRAM requirements above to see which fits your GPU or Mac.