Codegemma 2B vs Functiongemma 270M Ft Mobile Actions
Side-by-side comparison of VRAM requirements, quantization, context length, and hardware compatibility.
Specifications
| Codegemma 2B | Functiongemma 270M Ft Mobile Actions | |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 2.5B | 270M |
| Context | — | — |
| Architecture | — | — |
| License | Gemma Terms | Gemma Terms |
| Downloads | 5.8K | 204 |
| Released | Aug 2024 | Jun 2026 |
VRAM by Quantization: Codegemma 2B vs Functiongemma 270M Ft Mobile Actions
| Quantization | Bits | Codegemma 2B VRAM | Functiongemma 270M Ft Mobile Actions VRAM |
|---|---|---|---|
| BF16 | 16.00 | 5.5 GB | 0.6 GB |
Verdict
Functiongemma 270M Ft Mobile Actions needs less VRAM at BF16 (0.6 GB vs 5.5 GB), so it fits on smaller GPUs. Codegemma 2B is the more widely downloaded of the two.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Which needs less VRAM, Codegemma 2B or Functiongemma 270M Ft Mobile Actions?
At BF16, Codegemma 2B needs 5.5 GB and Functiongemma 270M Ft Mobile Actions needs 0.6 GB, so Functiongemma 270M Ft Mobile Actions is the lighter option to run locally.
- What is the difference between Codegemma 2B and Functiongemma 270M Ft Mobile Actions?
Codegemma 2B is a 2.5B model from Google (Gemma 2 family), while Functiongemma 270M Ft Mobile Actions is a 270M model from litert-community (Gemma 2 family). Compare their VRAM requirements above to see which fits your GPU or Mac.