Functiongemma 270M IT vs Shieldgemma 2B

Side-by-side comparison of VRAM requirements, quantization, context length, and hardware compatibility.

Functiongemma 270M IT

Google · 268M

Chat
Shieldgemma 2B

Google · 2.6B

Chat

Specifications

Functiongemma 270M ITShieldgemma 2B
Parameters268M2.6B
Context
Architecture
LicenseGemma TermsGemma Terms
Downloads214.7K4.6K
ReleasedJan 2026Aug 2024

VRAM by Quantization: Functiongemma 270M IT vs Shieldgemma 2B

QuantizationBitsFunctiongemma 270M IT VRAMShieldgemma 2B VRAM
Q2_K3.400.1 GB1.2 GB
Q3_K_M3.900.1 GB1.4 GB
Q3_K_S3.500.1 GB1.3 GB
Q4_04.000.1 GB1.4 GB
Q4_K_M4.800.2 GB1.7 GB
Q5_K_M5.700.2 GB2.0 GB
Q6_K6.600.2 GB2.4 GB
Q8_08.000.3 GB2.9 GB

Verdict

Functiongemma 270M IT needs less VRAM at Q4_K_M (0.2 GB vs 1.7 GB), so it fits on smaller GPUs. Functiongemma 270M IT is the more widely downloaded of the two.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which needs less VRAM, Functiongemma 270M IT or Shieldgemma 2B?

At Q4_K_M, Functiongemma 270M IT needs 0.2 GB and Shieldgemma 2B needs 1.7 GB, so Functiongemma 270M IT is the lighter option to run locally.

What is the difference between Functiongemma 270M IT and Shieldgemma 2B?

Functiongemma 270M IT is a 268M model from Google (Gemma 2 family), while Shieldgemma 2B is a 2.6B model from Google (Gemma 2 family). Compare their VRAM requirements above to see which fits your GPU or Mac.