Llama 7B vs Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct

Side-by-side comparison of VRAM requirements, quantization, context length, and hardware compatibility.

Llama 7B

huggyllama · 6.7B

Chat
Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct

Meta · 108.6B

Vision

Specifications

Llama 7BLlama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct
Parameters6.7B108.6B
Context2K
ArchitectureLlamaForCausalLM
LicenseOtherOther
Downloads152.1K460.7K
ReleasedJul 2024

VRAM by Quantization: Llama 7B vs Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct

QuantizationBitsLlama 7B VRAMLlama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct VRAM
Q2_K3.403.1 GB50.8 GB
Q3_K_M3.903.6 GB
Q3_K_S3.503.2 GB52.3 GB
Q4_04.003.7 GB
Q4_K_M4.804.5 GB
Q5_K_M5.705.3 GB
Q6_K6.606.1 GB
Q8_08.007.4 GB119.5 GB

Verdict

Llama 7B needs less VRAM at Q2_K (3.1 GB vs 50.8 GB), so it fits on smaller GPUs. Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct is the more widely downloaded of the two.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which needs less VRAM, Llama 7B or Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct?

At Q2_K, Llama 7B needs 3.1 GB and Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct needs 50.8 GB, so Llama 7B is the lighter option to run locally.

What is the difference between Llama 7B and Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct?

Llama 7B is a 6.7B model from huggyllama (Llama family), while Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct is a 108.6B model from Meta (Llama family). Compare their VRAM requirements above to see which fits your GPU or Mac.