Bella Bartender 8B Llama3.1 vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision Instruct
Side-by-side comparison of VRAM requirements, quantization, context length, and hardware compatibility.
Specifications
| Bella Bartender 8B Llama3.1 | Llama 3.2 90B Vision Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 8.0B | 88.6B |
| Context | 131K | — |
| Architecture | LlamaForCausalLM | — |
| License | Llama 3.1 Community | llama3.2 |
| Downloads | 3.7K | 1.0K |
| Released | Mar 2026 | — |
VRAM by Quantization: Bella Bartender 8B Llama3.1 vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision Instruct
| Quantization | Bits | Bella Bartender 8B Llama3.1 VRAM | Llama 3.2 90B Vision Instruct VRAM |
|---|---|---|---|
| BF16 | 16.00 | 16.6 GB | 194.9 GB |
Verdict
Bella Bartender 8B Llama3.1 needs less VRAM at BF16 (16.6 GB vs 194.9 GB), so it fits on smaller GPUs. Bella Bartender 8B Llama3.1 is the more widely downloaded of the two.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Which needs less VRAM, Bella Bartender 8B Llama3.1 or Llama 3.2 90B Vision Instruct?
At BF16, Bella Bartender 8B Llama3.1 needs 16.6 GB and Llama 3.2 90B Vision Instruct needs 194.9 GB, so Bella Bartender 8B Llama3.1 is the lighter option to run locally.
- What is the difference between Bella Bartender 8B Llama3.1 and Llama 3.2 90B Vision Instruct?
Bella Bartender 8B Llama3.1 is a 8.0B model from juiceb0xc0de (Llama 3 family), while Llama 3.2 90B Vision Instruct is a 88.6B model from Meta (Llama 3 family). Compare their VRAM requirements above to see which fits your GPU or Mac.