CyberSecQwen 4B vs Nemotron Research Reasoning Qwen 1.5B

Side-by-side comparison of VRAM requirements, quantization, context length, and hardware compatibility.

CyberSecQwen 4B

lablab-ai-amd-developer-hackathon · 4.0B

Chat
Nemotron Research Reasoning Qwen 1.5B

NVIDIA · 1.8B

ChatReasoning

Specifications

CyberSecQwen 4BNemotron Research Reasoning Qwen 1.5B
Parameters4.0B1.8B
Context262K131K
ArchitectureQwen3ForCausalLMQwen2ForCausalLM
LicenseApache 2.0CC BY-NC 4.0
Downloads1.2K3.3K
ReleasedMay 2026Nov 2025

VRAM by Quantization: CyberSecQwen 4B vs Nemotron Research Reasoning Qwen 1.5B

QuantizationBitsCyberSecQwen 4B VRAMNemotron Research Reasoning Qwen 1.5B VRAM
BF1616.008.5 GB3.9 GB

Verdict

Nemotron Research Reasoning Qwen 1.5B needs less VRAM at BF16 (3.9 GB vs 8.5 GB), so it fits on smaller GPUs. CyberSecQwen 4B supports a longer context window (262K tokens). Nemotron Research Reasoning Qwen 1.5B is the more widely downloaded of the two.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which needs less VRAM, CyberSecQwen 4B or Nemotron Research Reasoning Qwen 1.5B?

At BF16, CyberSecQwen 4B needs 8.5 GB and Nemotron Research Reasoning Qwen 1.5B needs 3.9 GB, so Nemotron Research Reasoning Qwen 1.5B is the lighter option to run locally.

Which has a longer context window, CyberSecQwen 4B or Nemotron Research Reasoning Qwen 1.5B?

CyberSecQwen 4B supports 262,144 tokens and Nemotron Research Reasoning Qwen 1.5B supports 131,072 tokens.

What is the difference between CyberSecQwen 4B and Nemotron Research Reasoning Qwen 1.5B?

CyberSecQwen 4B is a 4.0B model from lablab-ai-amd-developer-hackathon (Qwen family), while Nemotron Research Reasoning Qwen 1.5B is a 1.8B model from NVIDIA (Qwen family). Compare their VRAM requirements above to see which fits your GPU or Mac.