Llama Poro 2 8B Instruct vs Llama Guard 3 1B
Side-by-side comparison of VRAM requirements, quantization, context length, and hardware compatibility.
Specifications
| Llama Poro 2 8B Instruct | Llama Guard 3 1B | |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 8.0B | 1.5B |
| Context | 8K | — |
| Architecture | LlamaForCausalLM | — |
| License | llama3.3 | llama3.2 |
| Downloads | 1.6K | 44.9K |
| Released | Nov 2025 | Sep 2024 |
VRAM by Quantization: Llama Poro 2 8B Instruct vs Llama Guard 3 1B
| Quantization | Bits | Llama Poro 2 8B Instruct VRAM | Llama Guard 3 1B VRAM |
|---|---|---|---|
| BF16 | 16.00 | 16.6 GB | 3.3 GB |
Verdict
Llama Guard 3 1B needs less VRAM at BF16 (3.3 GB vs 16.6 GB), so it fits on smaller GPUs. Llama Guard 3 1B is the more widely downloaded of the two.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Which needs less VRAM, Llama Poro 2 8B Instruct or Llama Guard 3 1B?
At BF16, Llama Poro 2 8B Instruct needs 16.6 GB and Llama Guard 3 1B needs 3.3 GB, so Llama Guard 3 1B is the lighter option to run locally.
- What is the difference between Llama Poro 2 8B Instruct and Llama Guard 3 1B?
Llama Poro 2 8B Instruct is a 8.0B model from LumiOpen (Llama family), while Llama Guard 3 1B is a 1.5B model from Meta (Llama family). Compare their VRAM requirements above to see which fits your GPU or Mac.