Qwen3.5 4B Safety Thinking vs Qwen3 4B Thinking 2507

Side-by-side comparison of VRAM requirements, quantization, context length, and hardware compatibility.

Qwen3.5 4B Safety Thinking

MerlinSafety · 4.2B

ChatReasoning
Qwen3 4B Thinking 2507

Alibaba · 4.0B

Chat

Specifications

Qwen3.5 4B Safety ThinkingQwen3 4B Thinking 2507
Parameters4.2B4.0B
Context262K262K
ArchitectureQwen3_5ForConditionalGenerationQwen3ForCausalLM
LicenseApache 2.0Apache 2.0
Downloads2.8K602.5K
ReleasedMar 2026Aug 2025

VRAM by Quantization: Qwen3.5 4B Safety Thinking vs Qwen3 4B Thinking 2507

QuantizationBitsQwen3.5 4B Safety Thinking VRAMQwen3 4B Thinking 2507 VRAM
Q2_K3.402.3 GB2.2 GB
Q3_K_M3.902.5 GB2.5 GB
Q3_K_S3.502.3 GB2.3 GB
Q4_04.002.5 GB
Q4_K_M4.803.0 GB2.9 GB
Q5_K_M5.703.5 GB3.4 GB
Q6_K6.603.9 GB3.8 GB
Q8_08.004.7 GB4.5 GB

Verdict

Qwen3 4B Thinking 2507 needs less VRAM at Q4_K_M (2.9 GB vs 3.0 GB), so it fits on smaller GPUs. Qwen3 4B Thinking 2507 is the more widely downloaded of the two.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which needs less VRAM, Qwen3.5 4B Safety Thinking or Qwen3 4B Thinking 2507?

At Q4_K_M, Qwen3.5 4B Safety Thinking needs 3.0 GB and Qwen3 4B Thinking 2507 needs 2.9 GB, so Qwen3 4B Thinking 2507 is the lighter option to run locally.

Which has a longer context window, Qwen3.5 4B Safety Thinking or Qwen3 4B Thinking 2507?

Qwen3.5 4B Safety Thinking supports 262,144 tokens and Qwen3 4B Thinking 2507 supports 262,144 tokens.

What is the difference between Qwen3.5 4B Safety Thinking and Qwen3 4B Thinking 2507?

Qwen3.5 4B Safety Thinking is a 4.2B model from MerlinSafety (Qwen family), while Qwen3 4B Thinking 2507 is a 4.0B model from Alibaba (Qwen family). Compare their VRAM requirements above to see which fits your GPU or Mac.