Llama 3.2 1B vs Llama 3.2 1B Instruct

Side-by-side comparison of VRAM requirements, quantization, context length, and hardware compatibility.

Llama 3.2 1B

Meta · 1.2B

Chat
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct

Meta · 1.2B

Chat

Specifications

Llama 3.2 1BLlama 3.2 1B Instruct
Parameters1.2B1.2B
Context131K
Architecture
Licensellama3.2llama3.2
Downloads2.4M8.3M
ReleasedOct 2024Oct 2024

VRAM by Quantization: Llama 3.2 1B vs Llama 3.2 1B Instruct

QuantizationBitsLlama 3.2 1B VRAMLlama 3.2 1B Instruct VRAM
Q2_K3.400.6 GB0.6 GB
Q3_K_M3.900.7 GB0.7 GB
Q3_K_S3.500.6 GB0.6 GB
Q4_04.000.7 GB0.7 GB
Q4_K_M4.800.8 GB0.8 GB
Q5_K_M5.701.0 GB1.0 GB
Q6_K6.601.1 GB1.1 GB
Q8_08.001.4 GB1.4 GB

Verdict

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct is the more widely downloaded of the two.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which needs less VRAM, Llama 3.2 1B or Llama 3.2 1B Instruct?

At Q4_K_M, Llama 3.2 1B needs 0.8 GB and Llama 3.2 1B Instruct needs 0.8 GB, so Llama 3.2 1B is the lighter option to run locally.

What is the difference between Llama 3.2 1B and Llama 3.2 1B Instruct?

Llama 3.2 1B is a 1.2B model from Meta (Llama 3 family), while Llama 3.2 1B Instruct is a 1.2B model from Meta (Llama 3 family). Compare their VRAM requirements above to see which fits your GPU or Mac.