MediPhi Instruct vs NuExtract
Side-by-side comparison of VRAM requirements, quantization, context length, and hardware compatibility.
Specifications
| MediPhi Instruct | NuExtract | |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 3.8B | 3.8B |
| Context | 131K | 4K |
| Architecture | Phi3ForCausalLM | Phi3ForCausalLM |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Downloads | 1.9K | 673 |
| Released | Dec 2025 | May 2026 |
VRAM by Quantization: MediPhi Instruct vs NuExtract
| Quantization | Bits | MediPhi Instruct VRAM | NuExtract VRAM |
|---|---|---|---|
| BF16 | 16.00 | 8.8 GB | 8.8 GB |
Verdict
MediPhi Instruct supports a longer context window (131K tokens). MediPhi Instruct is the more widely downloaded of the two.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Which needs less VRAM, MediPhi Instruct or NuExtract?
At BF16, MediPhi Instruct needs 8.8 GB and NuExtract needs 8.8 GB, so MediPhi Instruct is the lighter option to run locally.
- Which has a longer context window, MediPhi Instruct or NuExtract?
MediPhi Instruct supports 131,072 tokens and NuExtract supports 4,096 tokens.
- What is the difference between MediPhi Instruct and NuExtract?
MediPhi Instruct is a 3.8B model from Microsoft (Phi family), while NuExtract is a 3.8B model from numind. Compare their VRAM requirements above to see which fits your GPU or Mac.