Kimi K2.5 vs Kimi K2 Thinking

Side-by-side comparison of VRAM requirements, quantization, context length, and hardware compatibility.

Kimi K2.5

Moonshot AI · 1058.6B

Vision
Kimi K2 Thinking

Moonshot AI · 1058.1B

Chat

Specifications

Kimi K2.5Kimi K2 Thinking
Parameters1058.6B1058.1B
Context262K262K
ArchitectureKimiK25ForConditionalGenerationDeepseekV3ForCausalLM
LicenseOtherOther
Downloads1.7M161.5K
Released

VRAM by Quantization: Kimi K2.5 vs Kimi K2 Thinking

QuantizationBitsKimi K2.5 VRAMKimi K2 Thinking VRAM
Q2_K3.40453.8 GB453.6 GB
Q3_K_M3.90519.9 GB519.7 GB
Q3_K_S3.50467.0 GB466.8 GB
Q4_04.00533.2 GB532.9 GB
Q4_K_M4.80639.0 GB638.8 GB
Q5_K_M5.70758.1 GB757.8 GB
Q6_K6.60877.2 GB876.8 GB
Q8_08.001062.5 GB1062 GB

Verdict

Kimi K2 Thinking needs less VRAM at Q4_K_M (638.8 GB vs 639.0 GB), so it fits on smaller GPUs. Kimi K2.5 is the more widely downloaded of the two.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which needs less VRAM, Kimi K2.5 or Kimi K2 Thinking?

At Q4_K_M, Kimi K2.5 needs 639.0 GB and Kimi K2 Thinking needs 638.8 GB, so Kimi K2 Thinking is the lighter option to run locally.

Which has a longer context window, Kimi K2.5 or Kimi K2 Thinking?

Kimi K2.5 supports 262,144 tokens and Kimi K2 Thinking supports 262,144 tokens.

What is the difference between Kimi K2.5 and Kimi K2 Thinking?

Kimi K2.5 is a 1058.6B model from Moonshot AI (Kimi K2 family), while Kimi K2 Thinking is a 1058.1B model from Moonshot AI (Kimi K2 family). Compare their VRAM requirements above to see which fits your GPU or Mac.