GLM 4.6V vs GLM 4.7 Flash

Side-by-side comparison of VRAM requirements, quantization, context length, and hardware compatibility.

GLM 4.6V

zai-org · 107.7B

Vision
GLM 4.7 Flash

zai-org · 31.2B

Chat

Specifications

GLM 4.6VGLM 4.7 Flash
Parameters107.7B31.2B
Context131K203K
ArchitectureGlm4vMoeForConditionalGenerationGlm4MoeLiteForCausalLM
LicenseMITMIT
Downloads3.7K1.1M
ReleasedJan 2026

VRAM by Quantization: GLM 4.6V vs GLM 4.7 Flash

QuantizationBitsGLM 4.6V VRAMGLM 4.7 Flash VRAM
Q2_K3.4046.2 GB14.4 GB
Q3_K_M3.9052.9 GB16.3 GB
Q3_K_S3.5047.5 GB14.8 GB
Q4_04.0054.3 GB16.7 GB
Q4_K_M4.8065.1 GB19.8 GB
Q5_K_M5.7077.2 GB23.3 GB
Q6_K6.6089.3 GB26.9 GB
Q8_08.00108.1 GB32.3 GB

Verdict

GLM 4.7 Flash needs less VRAM at Q4_K_M (19.8 GB vs 65.1 GB), so it fits on smaller GPUs. GLM 4.7 Flash supports a longer context window (203K tokens). GLM 4.7 Flash is the more widely downloaded of the two.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which needs less VRAM, GLM 4.6V or GLM 4.7 Flash?

At Q4_K_M, GLM 4.6V needs 65.1 GB and GLM 4.7 Flash needs 19.8 GB, so GLM 4.7 Flash is the lighter option to run locally.

Which has a longer context window, GLM 4.6V or GLM 4.7 Flash?

GLM 4.6V supports 131,072 tokens and GLM 4.7 Flash supports 202,752 tokens.

What is the difference between GLM 4.6V and GLM 4.7 Flash?

GLM 4.6V is a 107.7B model from zai-org (GLM family), while GLM 4.7 Flash is a 31.2B model from zai-org (GLM family). Compare their VRAM requirements above to see which fits your GPU or Mac.