GLM 4.7 vs GLM 4.7 Flash

Side-by-side comparison of VRAM requirements, quantization, context length, and hardware compatibility.

GLM 4.7

zai-org · 358.3B

Chat
GLM 4.7 Flash

zai-org · 31.2B

Chat

Specifications

GLM 4.7GLM 4.7 Flash
Parameters358.3B31.2B
Context203K203K
ArchitectureGlm4MoeForCausalLMGlm4MoeLiteForCausalLM
LicenseMITMIT
Downloads66.2K1.1M
ReleasedJan 2026Jan 2026

VRAM by Quantization: GLM 4.7 vs GLM 4.7 Flash

QuantizationBitsGLM 4.7 VRAMGLM 4.7 Flash VRAM
Q2_K3.40152.9 GB14.4 GB
Q3_K_M3.90175.3 GB16.3 GB
Q3_K_S3.50157.4 GB14.8 GB
Q4_04.00179.8 GB16.7 GB
Q4_K_M4.80215.6 GB19.8 GB
Q5_K_M5.70255.9 GB23.3 GB
Q6_K6.60296.3 GB26.9 GB
Q8_08.00359.0 GB32.3 GB

Verdict

GLM 4.7 Flash needs less VRAM at Q4_K_M (19.8 GB vs 215.6 GB), so it fits on smaller GPUs. GLM 4.7 Flash is the more widely downloaded of the two.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which needs less VRAM, GLM 4.7 or GLM 4.7 Flash?

At Q4_K_M, GLM 4.7 needs 215.6 GB and GLM 4.7 Flash needs 19.8 GB, so GLM 4.7 Flash is the lighter option to run locally.

Which has a longer context window, GLM 4.7 or GLM 4.7 Flash?

GLM 4.7 supports 202,752 tokens and GLM 4.7 Flash supports 202,752 tokens.

What is the difference between GLM 4.7 and GLM 4.7 Flash?

GLM 4.7 is a 358.3B model from zai-org (GLM family), while GLM 4.7 Flash is a 31.2B model from zai-org (GLM family). Compare their VRAM requirements above to see which fits your GPU or Mac.