llmrun

QwQ 32B — Benchmarks

Benchmark scores for QwQ 32B aggregated from public leaderboards (6 boards), with how it ranks among open models and how it compares with its nearest neighbours. See hardware requirements for what you need to run it.

llmrun Composite Score →

96.2

90% range 93.3–99.2 · from 5 boards

QwQ 32B reasoning benchmarks

Multi-step logic and problem-solving — can the model think through a hard problem rather than recall an answer.

  • GPQA Diamond

    65.3%

    median 54.0%open leader 93.1%

    Overall best: Gemini 4 Argon (high) 96.4%

    62nd percentile · #38 of 98 open · #193 of 300 all

    Independent

    Epoch AI ·

  • Fiction.LiveBench

    83.3%

    median 61.1%open leader 86.1%

    Overall best: GPT 5 (Aug 07, 2025, medium) 97.2%

    94th percentile · #3 of 25 open · #11 of 58 all

    Independent

    Epoch AI ·

QwQ 32B coding benchmarks

Writing, editing, and fixing real code — measured by whether the resulting program actually runs and passes tests.

  • Aider Polyglot

    20.9%

    median 45.1%open leader 74.2%

    Overall best: GPT 5 (Aug 07, 2025, high) 88.0%

    35th percentile · #12 of 18 open · #57 of 69 all

    Independent

    Epoch AI ·

QwQ 32B math benchmarks

Symbolic and quantitative problem-solving, from competition math to multi-step calculation.

  • AIME 2024/2025

    59.2%

    median 52.8%open leader 98.6%

    Overall best: Claude Fable 5 (high) 100.0%

    56th percentile · #38 of 86 open · #168 of 283 all

    Independent

    Epoch AI ·

QwQ 32B knowledge benchmarks

Breadth and depth of factual knowledge across many subjects, paired with the reasoning to apply it.

  • MMLU-Pro

    69.1%

    median 52.1%open leader 88.0%

    Overall best: Gemini-3.1-Pro 91.2%

    73rd percentile · #40 of 145 open · #104 of 257 all

    Independent

    TIGER-Lab

QwQ 32B instruction following benchmarks

How precisely a model obeys explicit, verifiable instructions — format, length, and content constraints — and, more broadly, how much people prefer its responses head-to-head in blind human voting.

  • LMArena Text

    1335.6

    median 1321.5open leader 1487.1

    Overall best: Gemini 4 Argon (High) 1523.9

    55th percentile · #85 of 187 open · #232 of 405 all

    Arena

    Arena ·

Score vs VRAM in the 24 GB tier

  • QwQ 32B
  • Other models
  • Best Score for its VRAM

#16 of 35 that fit 24 GB

Each dot is a model at the best quant that fits a 24 GB GPU. The line joins the models with the best Score for their VRAM; a dot below it is beaten by a model that needs no more memory.

Full 24 GB ranking →

QwQ 32B vs its neighbours

Same boards for the nearest open models per llmrun Score and the best model that fits 24 GB. The highest score in each row is marked.

BoardQwQ 32Bthis modelQwen3.8 27Bbest in classQ4_K_M · 18 GBDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32Bnearest by ScoreQ4_K_S · 23 GBQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507nearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 19 GBGPT OSS 20Bnearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 13 GB
llmrun Score96.2122.197.296.796.3
GPQA Diamond65.3%—64.1%55.6%60.8%
AIME 2024/202559.2%—55.6%62.2%65.3%
MMLU-Pro69.1%———73.6%
LMArena Text1335.61437.8—1382.31317.4
Compare head to headCompareCompareCompareCompare

Scores aggregated from public benchmark sources (Epoch AI: 4 boards, Arena: 1 board, TIGER-Lab: 1 board) — each linked from the benchmark pages. llmrun does not run these benchmarks. Percentiles and ranks are among open models in the llmrun catalogue; the median and leader marks refer to the same field.