Codegemma 2B vs Txgemma 27B Chat
Side-by-side comparison of VRAM requirements, quantization, context length, and hardware compatibility.
Specifications
| Codegemma 2B | Txgemma 27B Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 2.5B | 27.2B |
| Context | — | — |
| Architecture | — | — |
| License | Gemma Terms | Other |
| Downloads | 5.8K | 339 |
| Released | Aug 2024 | Apr 2025 |
VRAM by Quantization: Codegemma 2B vs Txgemma 27B Chat
| Quantization | Bits | Codegemma 2B VRAM | Txgemma 27B Chat VRAM |
|---|---|---|---|
| BF16 | 16.00 | 5.5 GB | 59.9 GB |
Verdict
Codegemma 2B needs less VRAM at BF16 (5.5 GB vs 59.9 GB), so it fits on smaller GPUs. Codegemma 2B is the more widely downloaded of the two.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Which needs less VRAM, Codegemma 2B or Txgemma 27B Chat?
At BF16, Codegemma 2B needs 5.5 GB and Txgemma 27B Chat needs 59.9 GB, so Codegemma 2B is the lighter option to run locally.
- What is the difference between Codegemma 2B and Txgemma 27B Chat?
Codegemma 2B is a 2.5B model from Google (Gemma 2 family), while Txgemma 27B Chat is a 27.2B model from Google (Gemma 2 family). Compare their VRAM requirements above to see which fits your GPU or Mac.