Txgemma 27B Chat vs Functiongemma 270M Ft Mobile Actions
Side-by-side comparison of VRAM requirements, quantization, context length, and hardware compatibility.
Specifications
| Txgemma 27B Chat | Functiongemma 270M Ft Mobile Actions | |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 27.2B | 270M |
| Context | — | — |
| Architecture | — | — |
| License | Other | Gemma Terms |
| Downloads | 339 | 204 |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Jun 2026 |
VRAM by Quantization: Txgemma 27B Chat vs Functiongemma 270M Ft Mobile Actions
| Quantization | Bits | Txgemma 27B Chat VRAM | Functiongemma 270M Ft Mobile Actions VRAM |
|---|---|---|---|
| BF16 | 16.00 | 59.9 GB | 0.6 GB |
Verdict
Functiongemma 270M Ft Mobile Actions needs less VRAM at BF16 (0.6 GB vs 59.9 GB), so it fits on smaller GPUs. Txgemma 27B Chat is the more widely downloaded of the two.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Which needs less VRAM, Txgemma 27B Chat or Functiongemma 270M Ft Mobile Actions?
At BF16, Txgemma 27B Chat needs 59.9 GB and Functiongemma 270M Ft Mobile Actions needs 0.6 GB, so Functiongemma 270M Ft Mobile Actions is the lighter option to run locally.
- What is the difference between Txgemma 27B Chat and Functiongemma 270M Ft Mobile Actions?
Txgemma 27B Chat is a 27.2B model from Google (Gemma 2 family), while Functiongemma 270M Ft Mobile Actions is a 270M model from litert-community (Gemma 2 family). Compare their VRAM requirements above to see which fits your GPU or Mac.