Llama 2 70B Chat HF vs Llama 2 7B Chat HF Function Calling v2

Side-by-side comparison of VRAM requirements, quantization, context length, and hardware compatibility.

Specifications

Llama 2 70B Chat HFLlama 2 7B Chat HF Function Calling v2
Parameters69.0B7B
Context4K
ArchitectureLlamaForCausalLM
LicenseLlama 2 Community
Downloads108.0K1.4K
ReleasedApr 2024Nov 2023

VRAM by Quantization: Llama 2 70B Chat HF vs Llama 2 7B Chat HF Function Calling v2

QuantizationBitsLlama 2 70B Chat HF VRAMLlama 2 7B Chat HF Function Calling v2 VRAM
Q2_K3.4032.3 GB4.3 GB
Q3_K_M3.9037.0 GB4.8 GB
Q3_K_S3.5033.2 GB4.4 GB
Q4_04.0037.9 GB
Q4_K_M4.8045.5 GB5.6 GB
Q5_K_M5.7054.1 GB6.4 GB
Q6_K6.6062.6 GB7.2 GB
Q8_08.0075.9 GB8.4 GB

Verdict

Llama 2 7B Chat HF Function Calling v2 needs less VRAM at Q4_K_M (5.6 GB vs 45.5 GB), so it fits on smaller GPUs. Llama 2 70B Chat HF is the more widely downloaded of the two.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which needs less VRAM, Llama 2 70B Chat HF or Llama 2 7B Chat HF Function Calling v2?

At Q4_K_M, Llama 2 70B Chat HF needs 45.5 GB and Llama 2 7B Chat HF Function Calling v2 needs 5.6 GB, so Llama 2 7B Chat HF Function Calling v2 is the lighter option to run locally.

What is the difference between Llama 2 70B Chat HF and Llama 2 7B Chat HF Function Calling v2?

Llama 2 70B Chat HF is a 69.0B model from Meta (Llama 2 family), while Llama 2 7B Chat HF Function Calling v2 is a 7B model from Trelis (Llama 2 family). Compare their VRAM requirements above to see which fits your GPU or Mac.