Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct vs Llama Guard 3 8B

Side-by-side comparison of VRAM requirements, quantization, context length, and hardware compatibility.

Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct

Meta · 108.6B

Vision
Llama Guard 3 8B

Meta · 8.0B

Chat

Specifications

Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E InstructLlama Guard 3 8B
Parameters108.6B8.0B
Context
Architecture
LicenseOtherLlama 3.1 Community
Downloads460.7K53.9K
ReleasedOct 2024

VRAM by Quantization: Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct vs Llama Guard 3 8B

QuantizationBitsLlama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct VRAMLlama Guard 3 8B VRAM
Q2_K3.4050.8 GB3.8 GB
Q3_K_M3.904.3 GB
Q3_K_S3.5052.3 GB3.9 GB
Q4_04.004.4 GB
Q4_K_M4.805.3 GB
Q5_K_M5.706.3 GB
Q6_K6.607.3 GB
Q8_08.00119.5 GB8.8 GB

Verdict

Llama Guard 3 8B needs less VRAM at Q2_K (3.8 GB vs 50.8 GB), so it fits on smaller GPUs. Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct is the more widely downloaded of the two.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which needs less VRAM, Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct or Llama Guard 3 8B?

At Q2_K, Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct needs 50.8 GB and Llama Guard 3 8B needs 3.8 GB, so Llama Guard 3 8B is the lighter option to run locally.

What is the difference between Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct and Llama Guard 3 8B?

Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct is a 108.6B model from Meta (Llama family), while Llama Guard 3 8B is a 8.0B model from Meta (Llama family). Compare their VRAM requirements above to see which fits your GPU or Mac.