Phi 4 Mini Flash Reasoning vs Phi 4 Mini Reasoning

Side-by-side comparison of VRAM requirements, quantization, context length, and hardware compatibility.

Phi 4 Mini Flash Reasoning

Microsoft · 3.9B

ChatMathCodeReasoning
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning

Microsoft · 3.8B

ChatMathCodeReasoning

Specifications

Phi 4 Mini Flash ReasoningPhi 4 Mini Reasoning
Parameters3.9B3.8B
Context262K131K
ArchitecturePhi4FlashForCausalLMPhi3ForCausalLM
LicenseMITMIT
Downloads1.1K57.2K
ReleasedDec 2025Dec 2025

VRAM by Quantization: Phi 4 Mini Flash Reasoning vs Phi 4 Mini Reasoning

QuantizationBitsPhi 4 Mini Flash Reasoning VRAMPhi 4 Mini Reasoning VRAM
Q2_K3.402.3 GB2.2 GB
Q3_K_M3.902.5 GB2.4 GB
Q3_K_S3.502.3 GB
Q4_04.002.5 GB
Q4_K_M4.803.0 GB2.9 GB
Q5_K_M5.703.4 GB3.3 GB
Q6_K6.603.8 GB3.7 GB
Q8_08.004.5 GB4.4 GB

Verdict

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning needs less VRAM at Q4_K_M (2.9 GB vs 3.0 GB), so it fits on smaller GPUs. Phi 4 Mini Flash Reasoning supports a longer context window (262K tokens). Phi 4 Mini Reasoning is the more widely downloaded of the two.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which needs less VRAM, Phi 4 Mini Flash Reasoning or Phi 4 Mini Reasoning?

At Q4_K_M, Phi 4 Mini Flash Reasoning needs 3.0 GB and Phi 4 Mini Reasoning needs 2.9 GB, so Phi 4 Mini Reasoning is the lighter option to run locally.

Which has a longer context window, Phi 4 Mini Flash Reasoning or Phi 4 Mini Reasoning?

Phi 4 Mini Flash Reasoning supports 262,144 tokens and Phi 4 Mini Reasoning supports 131,072 tokens.

What is the difference between Phi 4 Mini Flash Reasoning and Phi 4 Mini Reasoning?

Phi 4 Mini Flash Reasoning is a 3.9B model from Microsoft (Phi 4 family), while Phi 4 Mini Reasoning is a 3.8B model from Microsoft (Phi 4 family). Compare their VRAM requirements above to see which fits your GPU or Mac.