Phi 4 Mini Flash Reasoning vs Phi 4 Reasoning

Side-by-side comparison of VRAM requirements, quantization, context length, and hardware compatibility.

Phi 4 Mini Flash Reasoning

Microsoft · 3.9B

ChatMathCodeReasoning
Phi 4 Reasoning

Microsoft · 14.7B

ChatMathCodeReasoning

Specifications

Phi 4 Mini Flash ReasoningPhi 4 Reasoning
Parameters3.9B14.7B
Context262K33K
ArchitecturePhi4FlashForCausalLMPhi3ForCausalLM
LicenseMITMIT
Downloads1.1K9.6K
ReleasedDec 2025Nov 2025

VRAM by Quantization: Phi 4 Mini Flash Reasoning vs Phi 4 Reasoning

QuantizationBitsPhi 4 Mini Flash Reasoning VRAMPhi 4 Reasoning VRAM
Q2_K3.402.3 GB7.0 GB
Q3_K_M3.902.5 GB7.9 GB
Q3_K_S3.507.1 GB
Q4_04.008.1 GB
Q4_K_M4.803.0 GB9.5 GB
Q5_K_M5.703.4 GB11.2 GB
Q6_K6.603.8 GB12.8 GB
Q8_08.004.5 GB15.4 GB

Verdict

Phi 4 Mini Flash Reasoning needs less VRAM at Q4_K_M (3.0 GB vs 9.5 GB), so it fits on smaller GPUs. Phi 4 Mini Flash Reasoning supports a longer context window (262K tokens). Phi 4 Reasoning is the more widely downloaded of the two.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which needs less VRAM, Phi 4 Mini Flash Reasoning or Phi 4 Reasoning?

At Q4_K_M, Phi 4 Mini Flash Reasoning needs 3.0 GB and Phi 4 Reasoning needs 9.5 GB, so Phi 4 Mini Flash Reasoning is the lighter option to run locally.

Which has a longer context window, Phi 4 Mini Flash Reasoning or Phi 4 Reasoning?

Phi 4 Mini Flash Reasoning supports 262,144 tokens and Phi 4 Reasoning supports 32,768 tokens.

What is the difference between Phi 4 Mini Flash Reasoning and Phi 4 Reasoning?

Phi 4 Mini Flash Reasoning is a 3.9B model from Microsoft (Phi 4 family), while Phi 4 Reasoning is a 14.7B model from Microsoft (Phi 4 family). Compare their VRAM requirements above to see which fits your GPU or Mac.