llmrun

Apple · M3 Ultra · Desktop

Best AI Models for Mac Studio (M3 Ultra, 512GB)

Runs 27–31B and 120B MoE models well; dense 70B fits but is slow at 12 tok/s.

512 GB unified508.5 GB for models819 GB/s66 TFLOPS FP16270 W2025
Buyabout $9,499

What LLMs can the Mac Studio (M3 Ultra, 512GB) run?

#ModelSpeedllmrun ScoreQuant · Memory
1
Q4_K_M · 458.4 GB · 40.4 t/s
40.4 tok/sQ4_K_M · 458.4 GB
2
Q4_K_M · 186.5 GB · 39.5 t/s
39.5 tok/sQ4_K_M · 186.5 GB
3
Q4_K_M · 453.8 GB · 16.7 t/s
16.7 tok/sQ4_K_M · 453.8 GB
4
Q4_K_M · 458.4 GB · 40.4 t/s
40.4 tok/sQ4_K_M · 458.4 GB
5
Hy3Tencent
Q4_K_M · 182.3 GB · 26.3 t/s
26.3 tok/sQ4_K_M · 182.3 GB
See all 439 models on the Mac Studio (M3 Ultra, 512GB) →Bars = traction for models without a Score yet

About the Mac Studio (M3 Ultra, 512GB)

The Mac Studio (M3 Ultra, 512GB) runs 27–31B and 120B MoE models well. macOS keeps about 3.5 GB, leaving 508.5 GB for models. Prompt reading is its weak spot: a 4K-token prompt waits 10 s before the first word on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017. At its $9,499 MSRP it gives 8.1 tok/s per $1,000, 6th of the 6 machines compared here. M3 Ultra generation, released 2025.

For models508.5 GBmacOS keeps 3.5 GB
ChipM3 Ultrareleased 2025

Mac Studio (M3 Ultra, 512GB) strengths and weaknesses

Strengths

  • Runs 120B MoE models: GPT OSS 120B at 75.5 tok/s in 70.8 GB
  • Room for long context: Qwen3.8 27B at Q4 uses 17.9 GB, leaving 490.6 GB free

Weaknesses

  • Slow prompt reading: A 32K-token prompt on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 waits 1.3 min for the first token
  • No CUDA: vLLM, AWQ, GPTQ and FP8 builds don't run; use GGUF or MLX

Memory for models

508.5 GB of 512 GB
120B MoE70.8 GB822B461.5 GB
120B MoE70.8 GB822B461.5 GB
For models 508.5 GBmacOS keeps 3.5 GBModel size at Q4

Everything on the size ladder fits. MiMo V2.6 Flash RL and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 together use 369.5 GB and leave 139 GB free.

Speed per dollar and per watt

On Qwen3.6 35B A3B (35B params, 3B active) at Q4_K_M. New means a shop price, either a street quote or the maker's own price; used is compared with used. The last two columns are the speed you get per $1,000 of price and per 100 W of power; higher is better. The Mac Studio (M3 Ultra, 512GB) has no current new price, so it is shown at its MSRP.

MachineNew pricetok/stok/s per $1,000tok/s per 100 W
about $5,376213
39.7
37.1
about $3,99976.6
19.2
28.4
about $3,49964.2
18.3
44.3
about $5,59975.9
13.6
25.7
about $7,09976.6
10.8
28.4
about $9,49976.6
8.1
28.4
MachineUsed pricetok/stok/s per $1,000tok/s per 100 W
RTX 409024 GBBest used value
about $3,000151
50.3
33.6
about $6,400213
33.3
37.1
about $4,52576.6
16.9
28.4

Cost per token: the Mac Studio (M3 Ultra, 512GB) against 24–512 GB machines and GPUs

On Qwen3.6 35B A3B (35B params, 3B active, Q4_K_M, 4K context). Speed, cost per token and power per token depend on the model.

24–36 GB96–128 GB192+ GBthis desktopat MSRP
$0.00$2.00$4.00$6.00$8.00$10.00$0$2,000$4,000$6,000$8,000$10,000$12,000$ per 1M output tokens · lower is betternew price →Mac Studio M3 Ultra · 96 GB · $3,999 MSRP · $3.46 per 1M tokensMac Studio M3 Ultra · 256 GB · $7,099 MSRP · $6.02 per 1M tokensMac Studio M2 Ultra · 192 GB · $5,599 MSRP · $4.84 per 1M tokensMac Studio M4 Max · 128 GB · $3,499 MSRP · $3.55 per 1M tokensRTX 5090 · 32 GB · ≈$5,376 · $1.71 per 1M tokensMac Studio M3 Ultra · 512 GB · $9,499 MSRP · $8.01 per 1M tokensMac Studio M3 Ultra 512 GBRTX 5090Mac Studio M3 Ultra 96 GBMac Studio M3 Ultra 256 GBMac Studio M2 Ultra 192 GBMac Studio M4 Max 128 GB
Cost per 1M output tokenson Qwen3.6 35B A3B · card over 3 years + power
$8.01
Machine, MSRP
$7.86
Power
$0.15
3-year cost of ownership$9,676
Include card price

Each dot is a machine or GPU; hover or tap it for its numbers, click to open it. Machines without a price for the chosen basis are left out. How we calculate cost per token

Similar devices and alternatives

Other memory sizes of the same machine first, then machines and GPUs people weigh against it, each with the one reason it is worth a look. Speeds on Qwen3.6 35B A3B.

Mac Studio (M3 Ultra, 512GB) tokens per second by model size

Output speed depends on memory bandwidth (819 GB/s). Grey rows need more than the 508.5 GB available.

  1. 9BQwen3.5 9B · Q4_K_M · 6.6 GB
    90.1tok/s
  2. 14BQwen3 14B · Q4_K_M · 11.9 GB
    60.3tok/s
  3. 27–31BQwen3.8 27B · Q4_K_M · 17.9 GB
    32.9tok/s
  4. 35B MoEQwen3.6 35B A3B · Q4_K_M · 22.0 GB
    76.6tok/s
  5. 70BLlama 3.3 70B Instruct · Q4_K_M · 51.3 GB
    12.3tok/s
  6. 120B MoEGPT OSS 120B · Q4_K_M · 70.8 GB
    75.5tok/s

Estimated speeds: Q4_K_M, 4K context, one user. How we estimate

Ultra generations: writing vs compute

M1 Ultra → M3 Ultra
Writing speed (tok/s)Compute (TFLOPS FP16)
1×2×3×M1 Ultra2022M2 Ultra2023M3 Ultra2025M1 Ultra · 31.2 TFLOPS FP16M1 Ultra · 75.9 tok/s · 800 GB/sM2 Ultra · 54.4 TFLOPS FP16M2 Ultra · 75.9 tok/s · 800 GB/sM3 Ultra · 65.5 TFLOPS FP16M3 Ultra · 76.6 tok/s · 819 GB/sCompute 2.1×Writing +1%
1×2×3×M12022M22023M32025M1 Ultra · 31.2 TFLOPS FP16M1 Ultra · 75.9 tok/s · 800 GB/sM2 Ultra · 54.4 TFLOPS FP16M2 Ultra · 75.9 tok/s · 800 GB/sM3 Ultra · 65.5 TFLOPS FP16M3 Ultra · 76.6 tok/s · 819 GB/sCompute 2.1×Writing +1%

Writing speed follows memory bandwidth and barely moved: 75.9 to 76.6 tok/s since the M1 Ultra. Compute, which sets how fast prompts are read, grew 2.1×. Indexed to the M1 Ultra; speeds on Qwen3.6 35B A3B, same 128 GB.

All 1352 models on the Mac Studio (M3 Ultra, 512GB)

Featured only

Best quant that fits in 508.5 GB, ordered by llmrun Score. Fit grades how well it runs here, S best. How ranking works

LLM models compatible with Mac Studio (M3 Ultra, 512GB) — ranked by Score, recency and Fit
ModelVRAMScoreFit
Q4_K_M·403.7 t/s
1.8 GBS100, Runs great
Mailguard Jev Style 1.5B
Q4_K_M·447.9 t/s
1.7 GBS100, Runs great
IFlow ROME
Q4_K_M·75.8 t/s
19.4 GBS86, Runs great
Qwen3 VL 2B Instruct
Q4_K_M·316.7 t/s
3.5 GBS100, Runs great
Darwin 4B Genesis
BF16·36.8 t/s
15.8 GBA74, Runs well
Gemma 4 E4B Luchador
BF16·34.7 t/s
16.8 GBA73, Runs well
Q4_K_M·24.8 t/s
27.0 GBA65, Runs well
Q4_K_M·796.3 t/s
1.4 GBS100, Runs great
TIPO 500M Ft
Q4_K_M·707.8 t/s
0.8 GBS100, Runs great
Codeguard Jev Style 1.5B
Q4_K_M·447.9 t/s
1.7 GBS100, Runs great
ReaderLM v2
Q4_K_M·447.9 t/s
1.7 GBS100, Runs great
Q4_K_M·102.9 t/s
6.6 GBS92, Runs great
BF16·210.0 t/s
4.3 GBS100, Runs great
Q4_K_M·84.6 t/s
7.8 GBS88, Runs great
Q4_K_M·447.9 t/s
1.7 GBS100, Runs great

Mac Studio (M3 Ultra, 512GB) specs and power

Specs

Chip
M3 Ultra
CPU cores
32
GPU cores
80
Unified memory
512 GB LPDDR5
For models
508.5 GB (macOS keeps 3.5 GB)
Memory bandwidth
819 GB/s
FP16 (dense)
65.5 TFLOPS
Neural Engine
36 TOPS
NPU
32-core Neural Engine
Power
270 W max
Size
Mac Studio
Released
2025-03-12
MSRP
$9,499

Mac Studio (M3 Ultra, 512GB) FAQ

Is the Mac Studio (M3 Ultra, 512GB) worth it for local LLMs in 2026?

At its $9,499 MSRP it gives 8.1 tok/s per $1,000 on Qwen3.6 35B A3B, 6th of the 6 machines compared here. It runs 27–31B and 120B MoE models well; dense 70B fits but is slow at 12 tok/s.

How much memory is available for AI on the Mac Studio (M3 Ultra, 512GB)?

About 508.5 GB of the 512 GB. macOS keeps roughly 3.5 GB for itself and other apps.

What is the largest model the Mac Studio (M3 Ultra, 512GB) can run?

Muse Spark Open 816B A42B (822.0B) is the largest at 4-bit or better: at Q4_0 it uses 461.5 GB, 91% of the available memory, and runs at about 20.0 tok/s. At 3-bit, a bigger model fits too: Inkling (952.4B) at Q3_K_M, 467.9 GB.

Can the Mac Studio (M3 Ultra, 512GB) run DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?

Yes. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 fits at Q4_K_M, using 458.4 GB of the 508.5 GB available, and it is the best model that runs well on this machine.

How long does the Mac Studio (M3 Ultra, 512GB) take to read a long prompt?

On DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, about 10 s for a 4K-token prompt and 80 s for a 32K-token document before the first word appears.