llmrun

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct 2506 — Benchmarks

Benchmark scores for Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct 2506 aggregated from public leaderboards (6 boards), with how it ranks among open models and how it compares with its nearest neighbours. See hardware requirements for what you need to run it.

llmrun Composite Score →

85.7

90% range 81.0–90.3 · from 5 boards

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct 2506 reasoning benchmarks

Multi-step logic and problem-solving — can the model think through a hard problem rather than recall an answer.

  • GPQA Diamond

    49.0%

    median 55.7%open leader 93.2%

    Overall best: Gemini 4 Argon (high) 96.4%

    43rd percentile · #57 of 100 open · #236 of 309 all

    Independent

    Epoch AI ·

  • CritPt

    0.0%

    median 0.9%open leader 26.6%

    Overall best: Gemini 4 Carbon (high) 36.0%

    19th percentile · #75 of 84 open · #230 of 244 all

    Lab-reported

    Epoch AI ·

  • DTBench

    59.9%

    median 68.7%open leader 93.9%

    Overall best: Claude Opus 5.5 Max 98.9%

    28th percentile · #51 of 70 open · #193 of 235 all

    Lab-reported

    Epoch AI ·

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct 2506 coding benchmarks

Writing, editing, and fixing real code — measured by whether the resulting program actually runs and passes tests.

  • SciCode

    26.4%

    median 40.1%open leader 60.9%

    Overall best: Claude Opus 5.5 Max 66.9%

    13th percentile · #63 of 72 open · #206 of 217 all

    Lab-reported

    Epoch AI ·

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct 2506 math benchmarks

Symbolic and quantitative problem-solving, from competition math to multi-step calculation.

  • AIME 2024/2025

    30.3%

    median 54.4%open leader 99.4%

    Overall best: Claude Fable 5 (high) 100.0%

    43rd percentile · #51 of 88 open · #224 of 292 all

    Independent

    Epoch AI ·

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct 2506 instruction following benchmarks

How precisely a model obeys explicit, verifiable instructions — format, length, and content constraints — and, more broadly, how much people prefer its responses head-to-head in blind human voting.

  • LMArena Text

    1356.2

    median 1321.4open leader 1488.2

    Overall best: Gemini 4 Carbon (High) 1527.5

    62nd percentile · #72 of 188 open · #204 of 408 all

    Arena

    Arena ·

Score vs VRAM in the 24 GB tier

  • Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct 2506
  • Other models
  • Best Score for its VRAM

#21 of 36 that fit 24 GB

Each dot is a model at the best quant that fits a 24 GB GPU. The line steps up to the best Score available at each amount of VRAM; a dot below it is beaten by a model that needs no more memory.

Full 24 GB ranking →

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct 2506 vs its neighbours

Same boards for the nearest open models per llmrun Score and the best model that fits 24 GB. The highest score in each row is marked.

BoardMistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct 2506this modelQwen3.8 27Bbest in classQ4_K_M · 18 GBMagistral Small 2506nearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 18 GBMagistral Small 2509nearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 18 GBPhi 4nearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 13 GB
llmrun Score85.7122.088.785.683.9
GPQA Diamond49.0%—56.1%47.6%56.1%
CritPt0.0%5.4%—0.3%0.0%
DTBench59.9%88.0%—61.3%—
SciCode26.4%46.6%—35.2%—
AIME 2024/202530.3%—30.0%28.1%13.8%
LMArena Text1356.21435.6——1256.3
Compare head to headCompareCompareCompareCompare

Scores aggregated from public benchmark sources (Epoch AI: 5 boards, Arena: 1 board) — each linked from the benchmark pages. llmrun does not run these benchmarks. Percentiles and ranks are among open models in the llmrun catalogue; the median and leader marks refer to the same field.