Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct 2506 — Benchmarks
Benchmark scores for Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct 2506 aggregated from public leaderboards (6 boards), with how it ranks among open models and how it compares with its nearest neighbours. See hardware requirements for what you need to run it.
- #79 of 106 open models
- #21 of 36 that fit 24 GB
- 6 boards · updated Nov 2026
- 100 = average open model
- Hardware requirements →
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct 2506 reasoning benchmarks
Multi-step logic and problem-solving — can the model think through a hard problem rather than recall an answer.
49.0%
49.0%
median 55.7%open leader 93.2%
Overall best: Gemini 4 Argon (high) 96.4%
43rd percentile · #57 of 100 open · #236 of 309 all
IndependentEpoch AI ·
0.0%
0.0%
median 0.9%open leader 26.6%
Overall best: Gemini 4 Carbon (high) 36.0%
19th percentile · #75 of 84 open · #230 of 244 all
Lab-reportedEpoch AI ·
59.9%
59.9%
median 68.7%open leader 93.9%
Overall best: Claude Opus 5.5 Max 98.9%
28th percentile · #51 of 70 open · #193 of 235 all
Lab-reportedEpoch AI ·
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct 2506 coding benchmarks
Writing, editing, and fixing real code — measured by whether the resulting program actually runs and passes tests.
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct 2506 math benchmarks
Symbolic and quantitative problem-solving, from competition math to multi-step calculation.
30.3%
30.3%
median 54.4%open leader 99.4%
Overall best: Claude Fable 5 (high) 100.0%
43rd percentile · #51 of 88 open · #224 of 292 all
IndependentEpoch AI ·
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct 2506 instruction following benchmarks
How precisely a model obeys explicit, verifiable instructions — format, length, and content constraints — and, more broadly, how much people prefer its responses head-to-head in blind human voting.
1356.2
1356.2
median 1321.4open leader 1488.2
Overall best: Gemini 4 Carbon (High) 1527.5
62nd percentile · #72 of 188 open · #204 of 408 all
ArenaArena ·
Score vs VRAM in the 24 GB tier
- Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct 2506
- Other models
- Best Score for its VRAM
#21 of 36 that fit 24 GB
Each dot is a model at the best quant that fits a 24 GB GPU. The line steps up to the best Score available at each amount of VRAM; a dot below it is beaten by a model that needs no more memory.
Full 24 GB ranking →Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct 2506 vs its neighbours
Same boards for the nearest open models per llmrun Score and the best model that fits 24 GB. The highest score in each row is marked.
| Board | Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct 2506this model | Qwen3.8 27Bbest in classQ4_K_M · 18 GB | Magistral Small 2506nearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 18 GB | Magistral Small 2509nearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 18 GB | Phi 4nearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 13 GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| llmrun Score | 85.7 | 122.0 | 88.7 | 85.6 | 83.9 |
| GPQA Diamond | 49.0% | — | 56.1% | 47.6% | 56.1% |
| CritPt | 0.0% | 5.4% | — | 0.3% | 0.0% |
| DTBench | 59.9% | 88.0% | — | 61.3% | — |
| SciCode | 26.4% | 46.6% | — | 35.2% | — |
| AIME 2024/2025 | 30.3% | — | 30.0% | 28.1% | 13.8% |
| LMArena Text | 1356.2 | 1435.6 | — | — | 1256.3 |
| Compare head to head | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
Scores aggregated from public benchmark sources (Epoch AI: 5 boards, Arena: 1 board) — each linked from the benchmark pages. llmrun does not run these benchmarks. Percentiles and ranks are among open models in the llmrun catalogue; the median and leader marks refer to the same field.