llmrun
Coding

SciCode Leaderboard

SciCode asks a model to write real scientific-computing code — implementing multi-step numerical methods drawn from physics, chemistry, biology, and math research — and checks the output against reference solutions. It was built by a team of scientists and ML researchers to test coding ability on genuine research problems, not typical software tasks.

Source: epoch66 open models ranked+141 proprietaryData through Oct 2026

Open models ranked on SciCode

# shows rank among open models / rank overall (including proprietary).

#ModelScoreVRAM @ Q4
1 / 8MiMo V2.6 Pro RL · 1020B
60.9%
~613 GB
2 / 13Kimi K3 · 2779.9B
59.5%
~1674 GB
3 / 15GLM 5.3 · 753.3B
59.0%
~456 GB
4 / 75Kimi K2.6 · 1026.9B
53.5%
~620 GB
5 / 87DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · 763.2B
51.8%
~458 GB
6 / 91GLM 5.3 Flash · 321.3B
51.6%
~195 GB
7 / 95MiMo V2.6 Flash RL · 309B
51.3%
~186 GB
8 / 96GLM 5.2 · 753.3B
51.2%
~456 GB
9 / 97DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 · 1650.5B
51.0%
~991 GB
10 / 105MiMo V2.5 Pro · 1023.2B
50.2%
~614 GB
11 / 107MiniMax M2.7 · 228.7B
50.1%
~138 GB
12 / 108DeepSeek V4 Pro · 1598.8B
50.0%
~960 GB
13 / 109DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 · 304.2B
49.9%
~183 GB
14 / 111Inkling Small · 266.0B
49.6%
~160 GB
15 / 117Kimi K2.5 · 1026.9B
49.0%
~620 GB
16 / 121Kimi K2.7 Code · 1026.9B
47.8%
~620 GB
17 / 126MiniMax M3 · 427.0B
47.1%
~257 GB
18 / 127Inkling · 952.4B
47.0%
~572 GB
19 / 131Qwen3.8 27B · 27.8B
46.6%
~17 GB
20 / 136Gemma 4 31B IT · 31.3B
45.5%
~20 GB
21 / 137GLM 4.7 · 358.3B
45.1%
~216 GB
22 / 139Ring 2.6 1T · 1025.4B
45.0%
~2057 GB
23 / 140DeepSeek V4 Flash · 290.9B
44.9%
~175 GB
24 / 141Muse Glimmer 30B · 29.8B
44.9%
~18 GB
25 / 142GLM 5.1 · 753.9B
44.8%
~457 GB
26 / 146MiMo V2.5 · 310.8B
43.1%
~187 GB
27 / 151Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 · 235.1B
41.4%
~142 GB
28 / 153Cogito 671B V2.1 · 671B
41.0%
~406 GB
29 / 157NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 · 560.5B
40.3%
~370 GB
30 / 160Gemma 4 26B A4B IT · 25.8B
40.1%
~16 GB
31 / 161Step 3.7 Flash · 201.4B
40.1%
~133 GB
32 / 164DeepSeek v3 0324 · 684.5B
39.0%
~415 GB
33 / 166DeepSeek V3.2 Exp · 685.4B
38.9%
~415 GB
34 / 169Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 · 218.8B
38.5%
~132 GB
35 / 171GLM 4.6 · 356.8B
38.4%
~215 GB
36 / 172DeepSeek R1 · 684.5B
38.3%
~415 GB
37 / 173DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus · 684.5B
38.0%
~415 GB
38 / 174Qwen3.6 27B · 27.8B
37.3%
~17 GB
39 / 175Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512 · 675B
36.6%
~446 GB
40 / 176Qwen3.6 35B A3B · 36.0B
36.6%
~22 GB
41 / 177Trinity Large Thinking · 398.6B
36.1%
~798 GB
42 / 178GPT OSS 120B · 116.8B
36.0%
~71 GB
43 / 179NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B BF16 · 123.6B
36.0%
~75 GB
44 / 180DeepSeek v3 · 684.5B
35.8%
~415 GB
45 / 181Qwen3.5 122B A10B · 125.1B
35.6%
~75 GB
46 / 182Qwen3 32B · 32.8B
35.4%
~20 GB
47 / 183Magistral Small 2509 · 24.0B
35.2%
~15 GB
48 / 184GPT OSS 20B · 20.9B
34.4%
~13 GB
49 / 185Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct · 401.6B
33.1%
~265 GB
50 / 186Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 · 30.5B
33.0%
~19 GB
51 / 188Qwen3 Coder Next · 79.7B
32.3%
~48 GB
52 / 189Qwen3 14B · 14.8B
31.6%
~9.5 GB
53 / 190Qwen3.5 9B · 9.7B
29.5%
~6.4 GB
54 / 191Qwen3.5 35B A3B · 36.0B
29.3%
~22 GB
55 / 192Devstral Small 2 24B Instruct 2512 · 24.0B
28.8%
~15 GB
56 / 194Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct 2503 · 24.0B
27.8%
~15 GB
57 / 196Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct 2506 · 24.0B
26.4%
~15 GB
58 / 197Llama 3.3 70B Instruct · 70.6B
26.0%
~47 GB
59 / 199MiMo v2 Flash · 309.8B
25.9%
~186 GB
60 / 200Granite 4.1 30B · 28.9B
25.8%
~18 GB
61 / 202Gemma 3 27B IT · 27.4B
23.3%
~18 GB
62 / 203Qwen3 8B · 8.2B
22.6%
~5.5 GB
63 / 204Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct · 108.6B
17.0%
~72 GB
64 / 205Gemma 3 12B IT · 12.2B
16.4%
~8.0 GB
65 / 206Llama 3.1 8B Instruct · 8.0B
13.2%
~5.3 GB
66 / 207Phi 4 Mini Instruct · 3.8B
10.8%
~2.9 GB

Score vs model size

Which models give the most quality for their size — the ones worth running locally.

10B100B1Tmodel size (log scale) →60.9%10.8%Kimi K3 · 2.8T · 59.5%Kimi K2.6 · 1T · 53.5%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · 763B · 51.8%GLM 5.2 · 753B · 51.2%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 · 1.7T · 51.0%MiMo V2.5 Pro · 1T · 50.2%DeepSeek V4 Pro · 1.6T · 50.0%DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 · 304B · 49.9%Inkling Small · 266B · 49.6%Kimi K2.5 · 1T · 49.0%Kimi K2.7 Code · 1T · 47.8%MiniMax M3 · 427B · 47.1%Inkling · 952B · 47.0%Gemma 4 31B IT · 31B · 45.5%GLM 4.7 · 358B · 45.1%Ring 2.6 1T · 1T · 45.0%DeepSeek V4 Flash · 291B · 44.9%Muse Glimmer 30B · 30B · 44.9%GLM 5.1 · 754B · 44.8%MiMo V2.5 · 311B · 43.1%Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 · 235B · 41.4%Cogito 671B V2.1 · 671B · 41.0%NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 · 561B · 40.3%Step 3.7 Flash · 201B · 40.1%DeepSeek v3 0324 · 685B · 39.0%DeepSeek V3.2 Exp · 685B · 38.9%Command A Plus 05 2026 BF16 · 219B · 38.5%GLM 4.6 · 357B · 38.4%DeepSeek R1 · 684B · 38.3%DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus · 685B · 38.0%Qwen3.6 27B · 28B · 37.3%Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512 · 675B · 36.6%Qwen3.6 35B A3B · 36B · 36.6%Trinity Large Thinking · 399B · 36.1%NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B BF16 · 124B · 36.0%GPT OSS 120B · 117B · 36.0%DeepSeek v3 · 685B · 35.8%Qwen3.5 122B A10B · 125B · 35.6%Qwen3 32B · 33B · 35.4%Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct · 402B · 33.1%Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 · 31B · 33.0%Qwen3 Coder Next · 80B · 32.3%Qwen3.5 35B A3B · 36B · 29.3%Devstral Small 2 24B Instruct 2512 · 24B · 28.8%Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct 2503 · 24B · 27.8%Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct 2506 · 24B · 26.4%Llama 3.3 70B Instruct · 71B · 26.0%MiMo v2 Flash · 310B · 25.9%Granite 4.1 30B · 29B · 25.8%Gemma 3 27B IT · 27B · 23.3%Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct · 109B · 17.0%Gemma 3 12B IT · 12B · 16.4%Phi 4 Mini Instruct · 4B · 10.8%Phi 4 Mini InstructLlama 3.1 8B Instruct · 8B · 13.2%Llama 3.1 8B InstructQwen3 8B · 8B · 22.6%Qwen3 8BQwen3.5 9B · 10B · 29.5%Qwen3.5 9BQwen3 14B · 15B · 31.6%GPT OSS 20B · 21B · 34.4%GPT OSS 20BMagistral Small 2509 · 24B · 35.2%Magistral Small 2509Gemma 4 26B A4B IT · 26B · 40.1%Gemma 4 26B A4B ITQwen3.8 27B · 28B · 46.6%Qwen3.8 27BMiniMax M2.7 · 229B · 50.1%MiMo V2.6 Flash RL · 309B · 51.3%MiMo V2.6 Flash RLGLM 5.3 Flash · 321B · 51.6%GLM 5.3 FlashGLM 5.3 · 753B · 59.0%GLM 5.3MiMo V2.6 Pro RL · 1T · 60.9%MiMo V2.6 Pro RL
Each dot is a model. Up = higher score, left = smaller (easier to run locally). The dashed line marks the efficiency frontier — the best score you can get at each size or smaller.
  • Phi 4 Mini Instruct, 4B, score 10.8% — on the efficiency frontier (best score at its size or smaller).
  • Llama 3.1 8B Instruct, 8B, score 13.2% — on the efficiency frontier (best score at its size or smaller).
  • Qwen3 8B, 8B, score 22.6% — on the efficiency frontier (best score at its size or smaller).
  • Qwen3.5 9B, 10B, score 29.5% — on the efficiency frontier (best score at its size or smaller).
  • Qwen3 14B, 15B, score 31.6% — on the efficiency frontier (best score at its size or smaller).
  • GPT OSS 20B, 21B, score 34.4% — on the efficiency frontier (best score at its size or smaller).
  • Magistral Small 2509, 24B, score 35.2% — on the efficiency frontier (best score at its size or smaller).
  • Gemma 4 26B A4B IT, 26B, score 40.1% — on the efficiency frontier (best score at its size or smaller).
  • Qwen3.8 27B, 28B, score 46.6% — on the efficiency frontier (best score at its size or smaller).
  • MiniMax M2.7, 229B, score 50.1% — on the efficiency frontier (best score at its size or smaller).
  • MiMo V2.6 Flash RL, 309B, score 51.3% — on the efficiency frontier (best score at its size or smaller).
  • GLM 5.3 Flash, 321B, score 51.6% — on the efficiency frontier (best score at its size or smaller).
  • GLM 5.3, 753B, score 59.0% — on the efficiency frontier (best score at its size or smaller).
  • MiMo V2.6 Pro RL, 1T, score 60.9% — on the efficiency frontier (best score at its size or smaller).

SciCode: frequently asked questions

What is the best open LLM on SciCode?
MiMo V2.6 Pro RL is the top open model on SciCode, scoring 60.9%. Among all models tested — including proprietary ones — it ranks #7. The top model overall is Claude Opus 5.5 Max (Anthropic) at 66.9%.
What's the best SciCode model you can run on a 24 GB GPU?
Qwen3.8 27B is the highest-scoring open model that fits in 24 GB at 4-bit quantization (~17 GB), scoring 46.6% on SciCode.
What's the best SciCode model you can run on a 12 GB GPU?
Qwen3 14B is the highest-scoring open model that fits in 12 GB at 4-bit quantization (~9.5 GB), scoring 31.6% on SciCode.
Can open models match proprietary models on SciCode?
Not quite on SciCode: the strongest proprietary model (Claude Opus 5.5 Max) scores 66.9%, ahead of the best open model (MiMo V2.6 Pro RL) at 60.9% — but you can run the open one yourself.

Scores aggregated from epoch. llmrun does not run this benchmark — see the source for methodology, or the about benchmarks for what it measures.