llmrun
Knowledge

ARC Challenge Leaderboard

ARC Challenge is a set of grade-school science questions, curated by the Allen Institute for AI (AI2) to exclude ones that simple word-matching or retrieval can answer. It measures science knowledge paired with the reasoning needed to apply it.

Source: epoch56 open models ranked+20 proprietaryData through Dec 2024

All models ranked on ARC Challenge

Proprietary / closed models are shown dimmed — you can't run them locally, but they show where the open field stands.

#ModelScoreVRAM @ Q4
1DeepSeek v3 · 684.5B
95.3%
~415 GB
2Llama 3.1 405B · 405.9B
95.3%
~268 GB
3Qwen2.5 72B · 72.7B
94.5%
~45 GB
4DeepSeek v2 · 235.7B
92.2%
~144 GB
5Phi 3 Medium 128k Instruct · 14.0B
91.6%
~9.1 GB
6Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct · 7.4B
90.7%
~15 GB
7GPT 3.5 Turbo (Nov 06) · proprietary
87.4%
API only
8Mixtral 8x7B v0.1 · 46.7B
87.3%
~29 GB
9Claude Instant 1.2 · proprietary
86.3%
API only
10StableBeluga2 · 70B
86.1%
~43 GB
11Claude Instant 1.1 · proprietary
85.7%
API only
12PaLM 540B · proprietary
85.2%
API only
13Text Davinci 002 · proprietary
85.2%
API only
14Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct · 3.8B
84.9%
~3.4 GB
15Qwen 14B · 14.2B
84.4%
~9.3 GB
16Meta Llama 3 8B Instruct · 8.0B
82.8%
~5.3 GB
17Internlm 20B · 20B
81.7%
~43 GB
18Mistral 7B v0.1 · 7.2B
78.6%
~4.9 GB
19Gemma 7B · 8.5B
78.3%
~19 GB
20Llama 2 70B HF · 69.0B
78.3%
~152 GB
21Phi 2 · 2.8B
75.9%
~2.6 GB
22Qwen 7B · 7.7B
75.3%
~5.1 GB
23Qwen2.5 Coder 32B · 32.8B
70.5%
~21 GB
24Internlm 7B · 7B
69.5%
~15 GB
25Llama 65B · proprietary
69.5%
API only
26PaLM 2 L · proprietary
69.2%
API only
27Falcon 180B · 180B
67.8%
~396 GB
28Llama 33B · proprietary
67.5%
API only
29Qwen2.5 Coder 14B · 14.8B
66.0%
~9.6 GB
30PaLM 2 M · proprietary
64.9%
API only
31DeepSeek Coder V2 Base · proprietary
64.3%
API only
32Falcon 40B · 41.8B
61.9%
~28 GB
33Chatglm2 6B · 6B
61.0%
~4.0 GB
34Qwen2.5 Coder 7B · 7.6B
60.9%
~5.0 GB
35Llama 2 13B HF · 13.0B
60.3%
~8.6 GB
36PaLM 2 S · proprietary
59.6%
API only
37DeepSeek Coder v2 Lite Base · 15.7B
57.3%
~10 GB
38Yi 9B · 8.8B
55.6%
~5.8 GB
39Nemotron 4 15B · proprietary
55.5%
API only
40INTELLECT 1 Instruct · 10.2B
54.5%
~6.8 GB
41Llama 2 34B · proprietary
54.5%
API only
42Qwen 1 8B · 1.8B
53.2%
~1.2 GB
43Text Davinci 001 · proprietary
53.2%
API only
44Qwen2.5 Coder 3B · 3.1B
52.9%
~2.2 GB
45Llama 13B · proprietary
52.7%
API only
46PaLM 62B · proprietary
52.5%
API only
47Mpt 30B · proprietary
50.6%
API only
48Yi 6B · 6.1B
50.3%
~4.1 GB
49Falcon 7B · 7.2B
47.9%
~4.8 GB
50Llama 7B · 6.7B
47.6%
~4.5 GB
51Starcoder2 15B · 16.0B
47.2%
~10 GB
52Llama 2 7B HF · 6.7B
45.9%
~4.5 GB
53Qwen2.5 Coder 1.5B · 1.5B
45.2%
~1.3 GB
54Phi 1 5 · 1.4B
44.4%
~0.9 GB
55Vicuna 13B v1.1 · proprietary
43.2%
API only
56Mpt 7B · proprietary
42.6%
API only
57Deepseek Coder 33B Base · 33.3B
42.2%
~21 GB
58Gemma 2B · 2.5B
42.1%
~1.6 GB
59Xgen 7B 8k Base · 7B
41.2%
~4.6 GB
60GPT Neox 20B · 20.7B
41.1%
~14 GB
61Dolly v2 12B · proprietary
39.6%
API only
62RedPajama INCITE 7B Base · 7B
39.1%
~4.6 GB
63Open Llama 7B · 7B
38.7%
~4.6 GB
64Starcoder2 7B · 7.2B
38.7%
~4.7 GB
65Baichuan2 13B Base · 13B
38.0%
~8.6 GB
66Deepseek Coder 6.7B Base · 6.7B
36.4%
~5.4 GB
67GPT J 6B · 6B
36.3%
~4.0 GB
68Opt 1.3B · 1.3B
35.8%
~2.9 GB
69CodeQwen1.5 7B · 7.3B
35.7%
~4.8 GB
70Qwen2.5 Coder 0.5B · 494M
34.4%
~0.6 GB
71Starcoder2 3B · 3.0B
34.2%
~2.2 GB
72Baichuan2 7B Base · 7B
32.5%
~4.6 GB
73Cerebras GPT 13B · 13B
32.4%
~29 GB
74Stablelm Tuned Alpha 7B · 7B
27.0%
~4.6 GB
75Deepseek Coder 1.3B Base · 1.3B
25.4%
~1.5 GB
76Gpt2 Xl · 1.6B
25.0%
~1.1 GB

Score vs model size

Which models give the most quality for their size — the ones worth running locally.

1B10B100Bmodel size (log scale) →95.3%25.0%DeepSeek v3 · 685B · 95.3%DeepSeek v2 · 236B · 92.2%Mixtral 8x7B v0.1 · 47B · 87.3%StableBeluga2 · 70B · 86.1%Qwen 14B · 14B · 84.4%Meta Llama 3 8B Instruct · 8B · 82.8%Internlm 20B · 20B · 81.7%Mistral 7B v0.1 · 7B · 78.6%Gemma 7B · 9B · 78.3%Llama 2 70B HF · 69B · 78.3%Qwen 7B · 8B · 75.3%Qwen2.5 Coder 32B · 33B · 70.5%Internlm 7B · 7B · 69.5%Falcon 180B · 180B · 67.8%Qwen2.5 Coder 14B · 15B · 66.0%Falcon 40B · 42B · 61.9%Chatglm2 6B · 6B · 61.0%Qwen2.5 Coder 7B · 8B · 60.9%Llama 2 13B HF · 13B · 60.3%DeepSeek Coder v2 Lite Base · 16B · 57.3%Yi 9B · 9B · 55.6%INTELLECT 1 Instruct · 10B · 54.5%Qwen2.5 Coder 3B · 3B · 52.9%Yi 6B · 6B · 50.3%Falcon 7B · 7B · 47.9%Llama 7B · 7B · 47.6%Starcoder2 15B · 16B · 47.2%Llama 2 7B HF · 7B · 45.9%Deepseek Coder 33B Base · 33B · 42.2%Gemma 2B · 3B · 42.1%Xgen 7B 8k Base · 7B · 41.2%GPT Neox 20B · 21B · 41.1%RedPajama INCITE 7B Base · 7B · 39.1%Starcoder2 7B · 7B · 38.7%Open Llama 7B · 7B · 38.7%Baichuan2 13B Base · 13B · 38.0%Deepseek Coder 6.7B Base · 7B · 36.4%GPT J 6B · 6B · 36.3%CodeQwen1.5 7B · 7B · 35.7%Starcoder2 3B · 3B · 34.2%Baichuan2 7B Base · 7B · 32.5%Cerebras GPT 13B · 13B · 32.4%Stablelm Tuned Alpha 7B · 7B · 27.0%Deepseek Coder 1.3B Base · 1B · 25.4%Gpt2 Xl · 2B · 25.0%Qwen2.5 Coder 0.5B · 494M · 34.4%Opt 1.3B · 1B · 35.8%Opt 1.3BPhi 1 5 · 1B · 44.4%Phi 1 5Qwen2.5 Coder 1.5B · 2B · 45.2%Qwen2.5 Coder 1.5BQwen 1 8B · 2B · 53.2%Qwen 1 8BPhi 2 · 3B · 75.9%Phi 2Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct · 4B · 84.9%Phi 3 Mini 4k InstructPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct · 7B · 90.7%Phi 3 Small 8k Instru…Phi 3 Medium 128k Instruct · 14B · 91.6%Phi 3 Medium 128k Ins…Qwen2.5 72B · 73B · 94.5%Qwen2.5 72BLlama 3.1 405B · 406B · 95.3%Llama 3.1 405B
Each dot is a model. Up = higher score, left = smaller (easier to run locally). The dashed line marks the efficiency frontier — the best score you can get at each size or smaller.
  • Qwen2.5 Coder 0.5B, 494M, score 34.4% — on the efficiency frontier (best score at its size or smaller).
  • Opt 1.3B, 1B, score 35.8% — on the efficiency frontier (best score at its size or smaller).
  • Phi 1 5, 1B, score 44.4% — on the efficiency frontier (best score at its size or smaller).
  • Qwen2.5 Coder 1.5B, 2B, score 45.2% — on the efficiency frontier (best score at its size or smaller).
  • Qwen 1 8B, 2B, score 53.2% — on the efficiency frontier (best score at its size or smaller).
  • Phi 2, 3B, score 75.9% — on the efficiency frontier (best score at its size or smaller).
  • Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct, 4B, score 84.9% — on the efficiency frontier (best score at its size or smaller).
  • Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct, 7B, score 90.7% — on the efficiency frontier (best score at its size or smaller).
  • Phi 3 Medium 128k Instruct, 14B, score 91.6% — on the efficiency frontier (best score at its size or smaller).
  • Qwen2.5 72B, 73B, score 94.5% — on the efficiency frontier (best score at its size or smaller).
  • Llama 3.1 405B, 406B, score 95.3% — on the efficiency frontier (best score at its size or smaller).

ARC Challenge: frequently asked questions

What is the best open LLM on ARC Challenge?
DeepSeek v3 is the top open model on ARC Challenge, scoring 95.3%. Among all models tested — including proprietary ones — it ranks #1. That puts it ahead of every proprietary model we track, including GPT 3.5 Turbo (Nov 06) (OpenAI) at 87.4%.
What's the best ARC Challenge model you can run on a 24 GB GPU?
Phi 3 Medium 128k Instruct is the highest-scoring open model that fits in 24 GB at 4-bit quantization (~9.1 GB), scoring 91.6% on ARC Challenge.
What's the best ARC Challenge model you can run on a 12 GB GPU?
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct is the highest-scoring open model that fits in 12 GB at 4-bit quantization (~15 GB), scoring 90.7% on ARC Challenge.
Can open models match proprietary models on ARC Challenge?
Yes — the best open model (DeepSeek v3, 95.3%) matches or beats every proprietary model we track on ARC Challenge.

Scores aggregated from epoch. llmrun does not run this benchmark — see the source for methodology, or the about benchmarks for what it measures.