llmrun

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct — Benchmarks

Benchmark scores for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct aggregated from public leaderboards (15 boards), with how it ranks among open models and how it compares with its nearest neighbours. See hardware requirements for what you need to run it.

llmrun Composite Score →

62.5

90% range 55.5–69.5 · from 9 boards

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct reasoning benchmarks

Multi-step logic and problem-solving — can the model think through a hard problem rather than recall an answer.

  • GPQA Diamond

    27.0%

    median 54.0%open leader 93.1%

    Overall best: Gemini 4 Argon (high) 96.4%

    11th percentile · #87 of 98 open · #287 of 300 all

    Independent

    Epoch AI ·

  • BALROG

    15.1%

    median 16.2%open leader 34.9%

    Overall best: GPT 6 Astra Max 68.3%

    43rd percentile · #9 of 15 open · #33 of 40 all

    Independent

    Epoch AI ·

  • CritPt

    0.0%

    median 1.1%open leader 26.6%

    Overall best: GPT 5.6 Sol Max 32.3%

    15th percentile · #53 of 66 open · #200 of 219 all

    Lab-reported

    Epoch AI ·

  • DTBench

    50.9%

    median 67.7%open leader 93.9%

    Overall best: Claude Opus 5.5 Max 98.9%

    14th percentile · #59 of 68 open · #197 of 214 all

    Lab-reported

    Epoch AI ·

  • LMCA

    5.4%

    median 24.7%open leader 55.5%

    Overall best: Claude Opus 5.5 Max 68.2%

    6th percentile · #51 of 54 open · #173 of 176 all

    Lab-reported

    Epoch AI ·

Other results (1)leaderboard-only, not part of the llmrun Score
  • PIQA

    81.2%

    median 80.1%open leader 88.6%

    Overall best: GPT 4o Mini (Jul 18, 2024) 88.7%

    63rd percentile · #16 of 40 open · #30 of 59 all

    Lab-reported

    Epoch AI ·

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct coding benchmarks

Writing, editing, and fixing real code — measured by whether the resulting program actually runs and passes tests.

  • SciCode

    13.2%

    median 38.7%open leader 60.9%

    Overall best: Claude Opus 5.5 Max 66.9%

    2nd percentile · #65 of 66 open · #206 of 207 all

    Lab-reported

    Epoch AI ·

  • WeirdML

    1.7%

    median 39.5%open leader 82.6%

    Overall best: GPT 6 Astra Promax 93.6%

    lowest · #46 of 46 open · #162 of 162 all

    Independent

    Epoch AI ·

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct math benchmarks

Symbolic and quantitative problem-solving, from competition math to multi-step calculation.

  • AIME 2024/2025

    1.7%

    median 52.8%open leader 98.6%

    Overall best: Claude Fable 5 (high) 100.0%

    11th percentile · #77 of 86 open · #271 of 283 all

    Independent

    Epoch AI ·

  • MATH Level 5

    22.9%

    median 41.6%open leader 96.6%

    Overall best: GPT 5 (Aug 07, 2025, high) 98.1%

    29th percentile · #28 of 39 open · #86 of 107 all

    Independent

    Epoch AI ·

Other results (1)leaderboard-only, not part of the llmrun Score
  • GSM8K

    82.4%

    median 52.3%open leader 94.5%

    80th percentile · #13 of 62 open · #19 of 93 all

    Lab-reported

    Epoch AI ·

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct knowledge benchmarks

Breadth and depth of factual knowledge across many subjects, paired with the reasoning to apply it.

  • MMLU-Pro

    44.3%

    median 52.1%open leader 88.0%

    Overall best: Gemini-3.1-Pro 91.2%

    40th percentile · #88 of 145 open · #181 of 257 all

    Independent

    TIGER-Lab

Other results (2)leaderboard-only, not part of the llmrun Score
  • MMLU

    56.1%

    median 62.5%open leader 87.2%

    Overall best: GPT 4o (Nov 20, 2024) 88.1%

    36th percentile · #55 of 85 open · #100 of 136 all

    Lab-reported

    Epoch AI ·

  • BoolQ

    82.8%

    median 76.4%open leader 89.4%

    Overall best: T5 11B 91.2%

    70th percentile · #12 of 38 open · #33 of 76 all

    Lab-reported

    Epoch AI ·

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct instruction following benchmarks

How precisely a model obeys explicit, verifiable instructions — format, length, and content constraints — and, more broadly, how much people prefer its responses head-to-head in blind human voting.

  • LMArena Text

    1211.2

    median 1321.5open leader 1487.1

    Overall best: Gemini 4 Argon (High) 1523.9

    24th percentile · #142 of 187 open · #333 of 405 all

    Arena

    Arena ·

Score vs VRAM in the 24 GB tier

  • Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
  • Other models
  • Best Score for its VRAM

#34 of 35 that fit 24 GB

Each dot is a model at the best quant that fits a 24 GB GPU. The line joins the models with the best Score for their VRAM; a dot below it is beaten by a model that needs no more memory.

Full 24 GB ranking →

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct vs its neighbours

Same boards for the nearest open models per llmrun Score and the best model that fits 24 GB. The highest score in each row is marked.

BoardLlama 3.1 8B Instructthis modelQwen3.8 27Bbest in classQ4_K_M · 18 GBQwen2.5 7B Instructnearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 5.8 GBGemma 3 4B ITnearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 5.0 GBMeta Llama 3 8B Instructnearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 7.9 GB
llmrun Score62.5122.165.164.061.7
GPQA Diamond27.0%—35.5%23.2%26.1%
BALROG15.1%—7.8%——
CritPt0.0%5.4%———
DTBench50.9%88.0%47.7%50.9%43.9%
LMCA5.4%41.4%6.4%2.8%—
SciCode13.2%46.6%———
AIME 2024/20251.7%—2.5%7.5%1.9%
MATH Level 522.9%———6.1%
MMLU-Pro44.3%——43.6%41.0%
LMArena Text1211.21437.8—1303.31223.7
Compare head to headCompareCompareCompareCompare

Scores aggregated from public benchmark sources (Epoch AI: 13 boards, Arena: 1 board, TIGER-Lab: 1 board) — each linked from the benchmark pages. llmrun does not run these benchmarks. Percentiles and ranks are among open models in the llmrun catalogue; the median and leader marks refer to the same field.