Qwen3.6 35B A3B — Benchmarks
Benchmark scores for Qwen3.6 35B A3B aggregated from public leaderboards (11 boards), with how it ranks among open models and how it compares with its nearest neighbours. See hardware requirements for what you need to run it.
- #41 of 106 open models
- #3 of 36 that fit 24 GB
- 11 boards · updated Nov 2026
- 100 = average open model
- Hardware requirements →
Qwen3.6 35B A3B reasoning benchmarks
Multi-step logic and problem-solving — can the model think through a hard problem rather than recall an answer.
84.9%
84.9%
median 55.7%open leader 93.2%
Overall best: Gemini 4 Argon (high) 96.4%
78th percentile · #23 of 100 open · #103 of 309 all
IndependentEpoch AI ·
0.3%
0.3%
median 0.9%open leader 26.6%
Overall best: Gemini 4 Carbon (high) 36.0%
42nd percentile · #51 of 84 open · #191 of 244 all
Lab-reportedEpoch AI ·
73.9%
73.9%
median 68.7%open leader 93.9%
Overall best: Claude Opus 5.5 Max 98.9%
55th percentile · #32 of 70 open · #155 of 235 all
Lab-reportedEpoch AI ·
29.7%
29.7%
median 25.5%open leader 55.5%
Overall best: Claude Sonnet 5.5 Max 68.3%
65th percentile · #20 of 56 open · #137 of 197 all
Lab-reportedEpoch AI ·
22.0%
22.0%
median 18.5%open leader 49.0%
Overall best: GPT 6 Astra Max 84.0%
68th percentile · #7 of 20 open · #59 of 136 all
IndependentEpoch AI ·
Qwen3.6 35B A3B coding benchmarks
Writing, editing, and fixing real code — measured by whether the resulting program actually runs and passes tests.
24.6%
24.6%
median 31.7%open leader 52.4%
Overall best: GPT 5.5 (unspecified) 84.7%
27th percentile · #12 of 16 open · #49 of 57 all
Lab-reportedEpoch AI ·
36.6%
36.6%
median 40.1%open leader 60.9%
Overall best: Claude Opus 5.5 Max 66.9%
35th percentile · #48 of 72 open · #188 of 217 all
Lab-reportedEpoch AI ·
34.5%
34.5%
median 39.5%open leader 82.6%
Overall best: GPT 6 Astra Promax 93.6%
24th percentile · #36 of 47 open · #133 of 162 all
IndependentEpoch AI ·
44.4%
median 44.4%open leader 95.0%
50th percentile · #8 of 15 open · #21 of 28 all
Lab-reportedEpoch AI ·
Qwen3.6 35B A3B math benchmarks
Symbolic and quantitative problem-solving, from competition math to multi-step calculation.
Score vs VRAM in the 24 GB tier
- Qwen3.6 35B A3B
- Other models
- Best Score for its VRAM
#3 of 36 that fit 24 GB
Each dot is a model at the best quant that fits a 24 GB GPU. The line steps up to the best Score available at each amount of VRAM; a dot below it is beaten by a model that needs no more memory.
Full 24 GB ranking →Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs its neighbours
Same boards for the nearest open models per llmrun Score and the best model that fits 24 GB. The highest score in each row is marked.
| Board | Qwen3.6 35B A3Bthis model | Qwen3.8 27Bbest in classQ4_K_M · 18 GB | Gemma 4 31B ITnearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 22 GB | Gemma 4 26B A4B ITnearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 17 GB | Qwen3.5 35B A3Bnearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 22 GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| llmrun Score | 106.8 | 122.0 | 106.7 | 105.8 | 105.8 |
| GPQA Diamond | 84.9% | — | 75.8% | 73.2% | 83.5% |
| CritPt | 0.3% | 5.4% | 1.4% | 0.0% | 0.6% |
| DTBench | 73.9% | 88.0% | 82.7% | 74.9% | 80.0% |
| LMCA | 29.7% | 41.4% | 39.3% | 29.7% | 29.5% |
| SciCode | 36.6% | 46.6% | 45.5% | 40.1% | 29.3% |
| WeirdML | 34.5% | — | 52.3% | 35.2% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 44.4% | 45.0% | 30.6% | — | — |
| AIME 2024/2025 | 86.7% | — | 73.3% | 82.2% | 70.0% |
| Compare head to head | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
Scores aggregated from public benchmark sources (Epoch AI: 11 boards) — each linked from the benchmark pages. llmrun does not run these benchmarks. Percentiles and ranks are among open models in the llmrun catalogue; the median and leader marks refer to the same field.