llmrun
Coding

ExploitBench Leaderboard

ExploitBench, from Carnegie Mellon University researchers Seunghyun Lee and David Brumley, scores AI agents on writing working exploits for 41 real, already-patched bugs in Chrome's V8 JavaScript engine, with modern mitigations switched on. Instead of pass/fail it grades 16 stages from crash up to arbitrary code execution, and Epoch AI reports the mean capability reached.

Source: epoch3 open models ranked+6 proprietaryData through Apr 2026

All models ranked on ExploitBench

Proprietary / closed models are shown dimmed — you can't run them locally, but they show where the open field stands.

#ModelScoreVRAM @ Q4
1Claude Mythos Preview Early · proprietary
73.8%
API only
2GPT 5.5 (unspecified) · proprietary
47.4%
API only
3Claude Opus 4.7 · proprietary
26.5%
API only
4Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview · proprietary
26.1%
API only
5Claude Sonnet 4.6 · proprietary
23.6%
API only
6Kimi K2.6 · 1026.9B
18.4%
~620 GB
7GLM 5.1 · 753.9B
18.1%
~457 GB
8Claude Haiku 4.5 (Oct 01, 2025, unspecified) · proprietary
13.7%
API only
9MiniMax M2.7 · 228.7B
13.3%
~138 GB

ExploitBench: frequently asked questions

What is the best open LLM on ExploitBench?
Kimi K2.6 is the top open model on ExploitBench, scoring 18.4%. Among all models tested — including proprietary ones — it ranks #6. The top model overall is Claude Mythos Preview Early (Anthropic) at 73.8%.
Can open models match proprietary models on ExploitBench?
Not quite on ExploitBench: the strongest proprietary model (Claude Mythos Preview Early) scores 73.8%, ahead of the best open model (Kimi K2.6) at 18.4% — but you can run the open one yourself.

Scores aggregated from epoch. llmrun does not run this benchmark — see the source for methodology, or the about benchmarks for what it measures.