llmrun
Coding

LiveBench Coding Leaderboard

LiveBench Coding evaluates code generation and completion on fresh, contamination-free programming tasks that are updated regularly.

Source: livebench19 open models ranked+51 proprietaryData through Jun 2026

Open models ranked on LiveBench Coding

# shows rank among open models / rank overall (including proprietary).

#ModelScoreVRAM @ Q4
1 / 16Kimi K3 · 2779.9B
81.5
~1674 GB
2 / 23DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · 763.2B
80.0
~458 GB
3 / 25GLM 5.2 · 753.3B
79.7
~456 GB
4 / 27GLM 5.3 · 753.3B
79.0
~456 GB
5 / 28GLM 5.3 Flash · 321.3B
79.0
~195 GB
6 / 31Kimi K2.6 · 1026.9B
78.6
~620 GB
7 / 40DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 · 1650.5B
77.2
~991 GB
8 / 44Smaug Flash · 304.2B
77.1
~609 GB
9 / 51Qwen3.8 27B · 27.8B
75.7
~17 GB
10 / 53DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 · 304.2B
75.0
~183 GB
11 / 55Kimi K2.7 Code · 1026.9B
74.0
~620 GB
12 / 57Qwen3.8 Flash Next · 180.0B
72.5
~108 GB
13 / 59Qwen3.6 27B · 27.8B
71.8
~17 GB
14 / 61Inkling · 952.4B
71.0
~572 GB
15 / 63NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 · 560.5B
70.7
~370 GB
16 / 64DeepSeek V4 Pro · 1598.8B
70.0
~960 GB
17 / 66DeepSeek V4 Flash · 290.9B
69.2
~175 GB
18 / 68DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp · 304.6B
68.2
~183 GB
19 / 69MiniMax M3 · 427.0B
68.2
~257 GB

Score vs model size

Which models give the most quality for their size — the ones worth running locally.

100B1Tmodel size (log scale) →81.568.2GLM 5.3 · 753B · 79.0Kimi K2.6 · 1T · 78.6DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 · 1.7T · 77.2DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 · 304B · 75.0Kimi K2.7 Code · 1T · 74.0Qwen3.8 Flash Next · 180B · 72.5Qwen3.6 27B · 28B · 71.8Inkling · 952B · 71.0NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 · 561B · 70.7DeepSeek V4 Pro · 1.6T · 70.0DeepSeek V4 Flash · 291B · 69.2DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp · 305B · 68.2MiniMax M3 · 427B · 68.2Qwen3.8 27B · 28B · 75.7Qwen3.8 27BSmaug Flash · 304B · 77.1Smaug FlashGLM 5.3 Flash · 321B · 79.0GLM 5.2 · 753B · 79.7GLM 5.2DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · 763B · 80.0DeepSeek V4.1 FlashKimi K3 · 2.8T · 81.5Kimi K3
Each dot is a model. Up = higher score, left = smaller (easier to run locally). The dashed line marks the efficiency frontier — the best score you can get at each size or smaller.
  • Qwen3.8 27B, 28B, score 75.7 — on the efficiency frontier (best score at its size or smaller).
  • Smaug Flash, 304B, score 77.1 — on the efficiency frontier (best score at its size or smaller).
  • GLM 5.3 Flash, 321B, score 79.0 — on the efficiency frontier (best score at its size or smaller).
  • GLM 5.2, 753B, score 79.7 — on the efficiency frontier (best score at its size or smaller).
  • DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 763B, score 80.0 — on the efficiency frontier (best score at its size or smaller).
  • Kimi K3, 2.8T, score 81.5 — on the efficiency frontier (best score at its size or smaller).

LiveBench Coding: frequently asked questions

What is the best open LLM on LiveBench Coding?
Kimi K3 is the top open model on LiveBench Coding, scoring 81.5. Among all models tested — including proprietary ones — it ranks #15. The top model overall is Claude Sonnet 5.5 Max (Anthropic) at 91.4.
What's the best LiveBench Coding model you can run on a 24 GB GPU?
Qwen3.8 27B is the highest-scoring open model that fits in 24 GB at 4-bit quantization (~17 GB), scoring 75.7 on LiveBench Coding.
Can open models match proprietary models on LiveBench Coding?
Not quite on LiveBench Coding: the strongest proprietary model (Claude Sonnet 5.5 Max) scores 91.4, ahead of the best open model (Kimi K3) at 81.5 — but you can run the open one yourself.

Scores aggregated from livebench. llmrun does not run this benchmark — see the source for methodology, or the about benchmarks for what it measures.