Coding

LiveBench Coding Leaderboard

LiveBench Coding evaluates code generation and completion on fresh, contamination-free programming tasks that are updated regularly.

Source: livebench8 open models ranked+29 proprietaryData through Jun 2026

All models ranked on LiveBench Coding

Proprietary / closed models are shown dimmed — you can't run them locally, but they show where the open field stands.

#ModelScore
1Claude Fable 5 Max · proprietary
86.0
2GPT 5.6 Sol Max · proprietary
83.9
3GPT 5.2 Codex · proprietary
83.6
4GPT 5.6 Luna Max · proprietary
82.9
5Claude Fable 5 · proprietary
82.5
6GPT 5.5 · proprietary
82.2
7Claude Opus 4.7 · proprietary
82.1
8GPT 5.6 Sol · proprietary
81.8
9Kimi K3 · proprietary
81.5
10Claude Sonnet 5 · proprietary
80.7
11Claude Opus 4.5 · proprietary
79.7
12GLM 5.2 · 753.3B
79.7
13Claude Opus 4.8 · proprietary
79.3
14Claude Sonnet 4.6 · proprietary
79.3
15Kimi K2.6 · 1058.6B
78.6
16GPT 5.6 Terra Max · proprietary
78.3
17Claude Opus 4.6 · proprietary
78.2
18Gemini 3.5 Flash · proprietary
78.2
19Qwen3.6 Plus · proprietary
78.2
20GPT 5.4 · proprietary
77.5
21Muse Spark 1.1 · proprietary
77.2
22GPT 5.6 Luna · proprietary
76.7
23Gemini 3.1 Pro · proprietary
76.5
24GPT 5.2 · proprietary
76.1
25GPT 5.6 Terra · proprietary
75.4
26Qwen3.7 Max · proprietary
74.2
27Kimi K2.7 Code · 1058.6B
74.0
28Qwen3.6 27B · 27.8B
71.8
29GPT 5.4 Mini · proprietary
71.6
30Inkling · 952.4B
71.0
31GPT 5.4 Nano · proprietary
70.8
32DeepSeek V4 Pro · 861.6B
70.0
33Grok 4.3 · proprietary
69.9
34DeepSeek V4 Flash · 158.1B
69.2
35Grok 4.5 · proprietary
68.6
36MiniMax M3 · 427.0B
68.2
37Grok Build 0.1 · proprietary
65.4

Score vs model size

Which models give the most quality for their size — the ones worth running locally.

100B1Tmodel size (log scale) →79.768.2Kimi K2.6 · 1.1T · 78.6Kimi K2.7 Code · 1.1T · 74.0Inkling · 952B · 71.0DeepSeek V4 Pro · 862B · 70.0DeepSeek V4 Flash · 158B · 69.2MiniMax M3 · 427B · 68.2Qwen3.6 27B · 28B · 71.8Qwen3.6 27BGLM 5.2 · 753B · 79.7GLM 5.2
Each dot is a model. Up = higher score, left = smaller (easier to run locally). The dashed line marks the efficiency frontier — the best score you can get at each size or smaller.
  • Qwen3.6 27B, 28B, score 71.8 — on the efficiency frontier (best score at its size or smaller).
  • GLM 5.2, 753B, score 79.7 — on the efficiency frontier (best score at its size or smaller).

LiveBench Coding: frequently asked questions

What is the best open LLM on LiveBench Coding?
GLM 5.2 is the top open model on LiveBench Coding, scoring 79.7. Among all models tested — including proprietary ones — it ranks #11. The top model overall is Claude Fable 5 Max (Anthropic) at 86.0.
What's the best LiveBench Coding model you can run on a 24 GB GPU?
Qwen3.6 27B is the highest-scoring open model that fits in 24 GB at 4-bit quantization (about 15 GB), scoring 71.8 on LiveBench Coding.
Can open models match proprietary models on LiveBench Coding?
Not quite on LiveBench Coding: the strongest proprietary model (Claude Fable 5 Max) scores 86.0, ahead of the best open model (GLM 5.2) at 79.7 — but you can run the open one yourself.

Scores aggregated from livebench. llmrun does not run this benchmark — see the source for methodology, or the about benchmarks for what it measures.