Mistral Large Instruct 2407 — Benchmarks
Benchmark scores for Mistral Large Instruct 2407 aggregated from public leaderboards (9 boards), with how it ranks among open models and how it compares with its nearest neighbours. See hardware requirements for what you need to run it.
- #87 of 106 open models
- 9 boards · updated Nov 2026
- 100 = average open model
- Hardware requirements →
Mistral Large Instruct 2407 reasoning benchmarks
Multi-step logic and problem-solving — can the model think through a hard problem rather than recall an answer.
49.0%
49.0%
median 55.7%open leader 93.2%
Overall best: Gemini 4 Argon (high) 96.4%
42nd percentile · #58 of 100 open · #237 of 309 all
IndependentEpoch AI ·
22.5%
22.5%
median 40.8%open leader 61.1%
Overall best: Claude Fable 5 Max 81.9%
17th percentile · #21 of 25 open · #93 of 101 all
IndependentEpoch AI ·
61.2%
61.2%
median 68.7%open leader 93.9%
Overall best: Claude Opus 5.5 Max 98.9%
33rd percentile · #47 of 70 open · #189 of 235 all
Lab-reportedEpoch AI ·
61.7
61.7
median 61.5open leader 64.7
Overall best: GPT 5.5 (high) 67.0
57th percentile · #11 of 24 open · #66 of 92 all
Lab-reportedEpoch AI ·
Mistral Large Instruct 2407 math benchmarks
Symbolic and quantitative problem-solving, from competition math to multi-step calculation.
8.5%
8.5%
median 54.4%open leader 99.4%
Overall best: Claude Fable 5 (high) 100.0%
31st percentile · #61 of 88 open · #244 of 292 all
IndependentEpoch AI ·
44.8%
44.8%
median 41.6%open leader 96.6%
Overall best: GPT 5 (Aug 07, 2025, high) 98.1%
57th percentile · #17 of 39 open · #68 of 107 all
IndependentEpoch AI ·
Mistral Large Instruct 2407 knowledge benchmarks
Breadth and depth of factual knowledge across many subjects, paired with the reasoning to apply it.
65.9%
65.9%
median 52.0%open leader 88.0%
Overall best: Gemini-3.1-Pro 91.2%
70th percentile · #45 of 146 open · #115 of 257 all
Independent
Mistral Large Instruct 2407 instruction following benchmarks
How precisely a model obeys explicit, verifiable instructions — format, length, and content constraints — and, more broadly, how much people prefer its responses head-to-head in blind human voting.
1314.4
1314.4
median 1321.4open leader 1488.2
Overall best: Gemini 4 Carbon (High) 1527.5
48th percentile · #99 of 188 open · #262 of 408 all
ArenaArena ·
Score vs VRAM in the ≤96 GB tier
- Mistral Large Instruct 2407
- Other models
- Best Score for its VRAM
#44 of 62 that fit ≤96 GB
Each dot is a model at the best quant that fits ≤96 GB. The line steps up to the best Score available at each amount of VRAM; a dot below it is beaten by a model that needs no more memory.
Full ≤96 GB ranking →Mistral Large Instruct 2407 vs its neighbours
Same boards for the nearest open models per llmrun Score. The highest score in each row is marked.
| Board | Mistral Large Instruct 2407this model | Qwen3.8 27Bbest in classQ4_K_M · 18 GB | Mistral Large Instruct 2411nearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 80 GB | Qwen2.5 72B Instructnearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 49 GB | Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instructnearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 77 GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| llmrun Score | 81.7 | 122.0 | 82.5 | 82.2 | 82.1 |
| GPQA Diamond | 49.0% | — | 51.3% | 49.1% | 51.8% |
| DTBench | 61.2% | 88.0% | 60.8% | 62.9% | 57.9% |
| ForecastBench | 61.7 | — | 61.5 | 61.6 | 59.1 |
| AIME 2024/2025 | 8.5% | — | 7.8% | 8.1% | 7.8% |
| MATH Level 5 | 44.8% | — | 50.3% | 63.2% | 62.3% |
| MMLU-Pro | 65.9% | — | 67.9% | 71.6% | 74.3% |
| LMArena Text | 1314.4 | 1435.6 | 1305.6 | 1302.9 | 1321.4 |
| Compare head to head | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
Scores aggregated from public benchmark sources (Epoch AI: 7 boards, Arena: 1 board, TIGER-Lab: 1 board) — each linked from the benchmark pages. llmrun does not run these benchmarks. Percentiles and ranks are among open models in the llmrun catalogue; the median and leader marks refer to the same field.