DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs GLM 5.3
GLM 5.3 leads llmrun Score 130.1 to 109.0; neither fits 24 GB.
Model A · DeepSeek
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp685.4B · 41B active · 160K context · MIT · Sep 2025
Model B · Z.ai
GLM 5.3753.3B · 41.8B active · 1M context · Other · Aug 2026
Choose DeepSeek V3.2 Exp if you want…
More permissive license
MIT vs Other
Choose GLM 5.3 if you want…
Higher llmrun Score
130.1 vs 109.0
Stronger at science
130.6 vs 101.2
Stronger at coding
129.9 vs 106.8
Ahead on the benchmarks
5 of 6 shared boards
Longer context window
1M vs 160K tokens
Newer release
Aug 2026 vs Sep 2025
On your hardware
Each model at its default quant (Q4_K_M), a smaller one when it must. Estimates, ±20%.
8 GB
RTX 4060 · 8 GB tier
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Doesn't fit
smallest quant needs 292.8 GB
GLM 5.3
Doesn't fit
smallest quant needs 256 GB
12 GB
RTX 3060 12GB · 12 GB tier
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Doesn't fit
smallest quant needs 292.8 GB
GLM 5.3
Doesn't fit
smallest quant needs 256 GB
16 GB
RTX 5060 Ti 16GB · 16 GB tier
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Doesn't fit
smallest quant needs 292.8 GB
GLM 5.3
Doesn't fit
smallest quant needs 256 GB
24 GBreference
RTX 4090 · 24 GB tier
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Doesn't fit
smallest quant needs 292.8 GB
GLM 5.3
Doesn't fit
smallest quant needs 256 GB
32 GB
RTX 5090 · 32 GB tier
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Doesn't fit
smallest quant needs 292.8 GB
GLM 5.3
Doesn't fit
smallest quant needs 256 GB
48 GB
RTX A6000 · 48 GB tier
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Doesn't fit
smallest quant needs 292.8 GB
GLM 5.3
Doesn't fit
smallest quant needs 256 GB
Mac 32 GB
Mac Mini M4 · Macs
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Doesn't fit
smallest quant needs 292.8 GB
GLM 5.3
Doesn't fit
smallest quant needs 256 GB
Mac 64 GB
Mac Studio M4 Max · Macs
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Doesn't fit
smallest quant needs 292.8 GB
GLM 5.3
Doesn't fit
smallest quant needs 256 GB
Mac 128 GB
Mac Studio M4 Max · Macs
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Doesn't fit
smallest quant needs 292.8 GB
GLM 5.3
Doesn't fit
smallest quant needs 256 GB
Reference GPU: RTX 4090. Tinted cell = the better pick on that machine (fits, more headroom, or at least 10% faster).
Overall
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
GLM 5.3
Coding
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
GLM 5.3
Agents
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
no data
GLM 5.3
Math
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
no data
GLM 5.3
Science
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
GLM 5.3
Reasoning
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
GLM 5.3
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp · #35 of 106 open models · #31 of 102 that fit ≤512 GB
GLM 5.3 · #6 of 106 open models · #4 of 102 that fit ≤512 GB
Benchmarks
6 shared boards: DeepSeek V3.2 Exp leads 0, GLM 5.3 leads 5 · Benchmarks imported Nov 2026
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
38.9%#40/72 open
Lab-reportedEpoch AI · Sep 2025
GLM 5.3
59.0%#4/72 open
Lab-reportedEpoch AI · Aug 2026
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
39.5%#25/47 open
IndependentEpoch AI · Sep 2025
GLM 5.3
75.4%#2/47 open
IndependentEpoch AI · Aug 2026
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
2.9%#30/84 open
Lab-reportedEpoch AI · Sep 2025
GLM 5.3
19.1%#7/84 open
Lab-reportedEpoch AI · Aug 2026
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
87.7%#11/70 open
Lab-reportedEpoch AI · Sep 2025
GLM 5.3
87.7%#12/70 open
Lab-reportedEpoch AI · Aug 2026
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
29.1%#25/56 open
Lab-reportedEpoch AI · Sep 2025
GLM 5.3
55.5%#1/56 open
Lab-reportedEpoch AI · Aug 2026
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
1034.0#12/17 open
Lab-reportedEpoch AI · Sep 2025
GLM 5.3
8163.6#2/17 open
Lab-reportedEpoch AI · Aug 2026
30 more boards (other shared and single-model boards)
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
1425.1#29/188 open
ArenaLMArena · Oct 2026
GLM 5.3
1480.6#2/188 open
ArenaLMArena · Oct 2026
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
1271.4#49/55 open
ArenaLMArena · Oct 2026
GLM 5.3
1622.8#7/55 open
ArenaLMArena · Oct 2026
Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp (4)
- Aider Polyglot74.2%
- CL-bench13.2%
- CL-bench Life9.5%
- Fiction.LiveBench83.3%
Only GLM 5.3 (24)
- GPQA Diamond90.9%
- LiveBench Coding79.0
- LiveBench Reasoning85.8
- AIME 2024/202591.1%
- FrontierMath68.8%
- LiveBench Math87.9
- SimpleQA41.0%
- FrontierMath Tier 429.3%
- DeepSWE69.0%
- FrontierCode40.1%
- APEX-Agents56.6%
- Chess Puzzles37.0%
- LiveBench 2026 Reasoning85.8
- Mystery Game Puzzles33.0%
- LiveBench 2026 Browser0.0
- LiveBench 2026 Data Analysis70.2
- ALE-Bench1317.4
- CursorBench42.6%
- FrontierSWE30.2%
- LiveBench 2026 Coding82.8
- LiveBench 2026 Long-Horizon35.9
- LiveBench 2026 Design77.3
- ProofBench49.0%
- LiveBench 2026 Research73.2
VRAM by quantization
Memory to load the model and 2K context; below it, the total at 32K and 128K context. Lighter side in bold.
Q2_K
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
295 GB~291.3 GB file
32K 294 GB · 128K 301 GB
GLM 5.3
324 GB~320.2 GB file
32K 323 GB · 128K 332 GB
Q3_K_M
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
338 GB~334.1 GB file
32K 337 GB · 128K 344 GB
GLM 5.3
371 GB~367.3 GB file
32K 370 GB · 128K 379 GB
Q4_K_M
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
415 GB~411.2 GB file
32K 414 GB · 128K 421 GB
GLM 5.3
456 GB~452.0 GB file
32K 455 GB · 128K 464 GB
Q5_K_M
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
492 GB~488.4 GB file
32K 491 GB · 128K 498 GB
GLM 5.3
541 GB~536.8 GB file
32K 540 GB · 128K 549 GB
Q6_K
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
569 GB~565.5 GB file
32K 568 GB · 128K 575 GB
GLM 5.3
626 GB~621.5 GB file
32K 625 GB · 128K 634 GB
Q8_0
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
689 GB~685.4 GB file
32K 688 GB · 128K 695 GB
GLM 5.3
758 GB801.4 GB file
32K 757 GB · 128K 765 GB
4 more quants
IQ2_M
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
not listed
GLM 5.3
258 GB238.6 GB file
32K 257 GB · 128K 266 GB
IQ3_XXS
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
not listed
GLM 5.3
296 GB281.7 GB file
32K 295 GB · 128K 304 GB
IQ4_XS
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
not listed
GLM 5.3
409 GB365.3 GB file
32K 408 GB · 128K 417 GB
BF16
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
1375 GB~1370.8 GB file
32K 1373 GB · 128K 1380 GB
GLM 5.3
1511 GB1508.0 GB file
32K 1510 GB · 128K 1519 GB
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
No local recipe · Q4_K_M
No GGUF repo entry exists for this model yet.
All ways to run DeepSeek V3.2 Exp →GLM 5.3
Ollama · Q4_K_M
ollama run hf.co/unsloth/GLM-5.3-GGUF| Spec | DeepSeek V3.2 Exp | GLM 5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Publisher | DeepSeek | Z.ai |
| Parameters | 685.4B | 753.3B |
| Active parameters | 41B per token | 42B per token |
| Architecture | DeepseekV32ForCausalLM | GlmMoeDsaForCausalLM |
| Context | 160K tokens | 1M tokens |
| Modalities | Chat, Function-calling | Chat, Function-calling |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Released | Sep 2025 | Aug 2026 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or GLM 5.3?
GLM 5.3 leads llmrun Score 130.1 to 109.0; neither fits 24 GB. Choose DeepSeek V3.2 Exp for more permissive license; choose GLM 5.3 for higher llmrun Score and stronger at science.
Which needs less VRAM, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or GLM 5.3?
At Q4_K_M, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp requires 415.1 GB while GLM 5.3 needs 456.2 GB, making DeepSeek V3.2 Exp the easier model to run on your local setup.
Can I run DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or GLM 5.3 on a 16 GB GPU?
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp does not fit (smallest quant needs 292.8 GB); GLM 5.3 does not fit (smallest quant needs 256 GB).
Which has a longer context window, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or GLM 5.3?
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp supports 163,840 tokens and GLM 5.3 supports 1,048,576 tokens.