DeepSeek R1 0528 — Benchmarks
Benchmark scores for DeepSeek R1 0528 aggregated from public leaderboards (13 boards), with how it ranks among open models and how it compares with its nearest neighbours. See hardware requirements for what you need to run it.
- #44 of 100 open models
- 13 boards · updated Oct 2026
- 100 = average open model
- Hardware requirements →
DeepSeek R1 0528 reasoning benchmarks
Multi-step logic and problem-solving — can the model think through a hard problem rather than recall an answer.
76.3%
76.3%
median 54.0%open leader 93.1%
Overall best: Gemini 4 Argon (high) 96.4%
73rd percentile · #27 of 98 open · #144 of 300 all
IndependentEpoch AI ·
1.1%
1.1%
median 11.8%open leader 72.9%
Overall best: GPT 6 Astra Max 95.0%
17th percentile · #16 of 19 open · #190 of 222 all
IndependentEpoch AI ·
21.2%
21.2%
median 65.3%open leader 94.5%
Overall best: Claude Fable 5 (xhigh) 98.5%
28th percentile · #14 of 19 open · #194 of 232 all
IndependentEpoch AI ·
40.8%
40.8%
median 40.8%open leader 61.1%
Overall best: Claude Fable 5 Max 81.9%
50th percentile · #13 of 25 open · #70 of 101 all
IndependentEpoch AI ·
75.0%
75.0%
median 61.1%open leader 86.1%
Overall best: GPT 5 (Aug 07, 2025, medium) 97.2%
85th percentile · #4 of 25 open · #14 of 58 all
IndependentEpoch AI ·
DeepSeek R1 0528 coding benchmarks
Writing, editing, and fixing real code — measured by whether the resulting program actually runs and passes tests.
71.4%
71.4%
median 45.1%open leader 74.2%
Overall best: GPT 5 (Aug 07, 2025, high) 88.0%
94th percentile · #2 of 18 open · #19 of 69 all
IndependentEpoch AI ·
41.6%
41.6%
median 39.5%open leader 82.6%
Overall best: GPT 6 Astra Promax 93.6%
62nd percentile · #18 of 46 open · #100 of 162 all
IndependentEpoch AI ·
804.1
804.1
median 694.1open leader 1524.5
Overall best: GPT 6 Astra Max 2951.3
60th percentile · #18 of 43 open · #69 of 122 all
Lab-reportedEpoch AI ·
Other results (1)· leaderboard-only, not part of the llmrun Score
53.8%
53.8%
median 49.6%open leader 59.2%
Overall best: Claude Mythos Preview Early 85.2%
75th percentile · #3 of 9 open · #28 of 46 all
Lab-reportedEpoch AI ·
DeepSeek R1 0528 math benchmarks
Symbolic and quantitative problem-solving, from competition math to multi-step calculation.
DeepSeek R1 0528 knowledge benchmarks
Breadth and depth of factual knowledge across many subjects, paired with the reasoning to apply it.
DeepSeek R1 0528 instruction following benchmarks
How precisely a model obeys explicit, verifiable instructions — format, length, and content constraints — and, more broadly, how much people prefer its responses head-to-head in blind human voting.
1421.4
1421.4
median 1321.5open leader 1487.1
Overall best: Gemini 4 Argon (High) 1523.9
83rd percentile · #33 of 187 open · #125 of 405 all
ArenaArena ·
Score vs VRAM in the ≤512 GB tier
- DeepSeek R1 0528
- Other models
- Best Score for its VRAM
#41 of 96 that fit ≤512 GB
Each dot is a model at the best quant that fits ≤512 GB. The line joins the models with the best Score for their VRAM; a dot below it is beaten by a model that needs no more memory.
Full ≤512 GB ranking →DeepSeek R1 0528 vs its neighbours
Same boards for the nearest open models per llmrun Score. The highest score in each row is marked.
| Board | DeepSeek R1 0528this model | Qwen3.8 27Bbest in classQ4_K_M · 18 GB | Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instructnearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 291 GB | GLM 4.6nearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 217 GB | Kimi K2 Instruct 0905nearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 617 GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| llmrun Score | 103.7 | 122.1 | 103.9 | 103.1 | 102.4 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.1% | 42.4% | — | — | — |
| ARC-AGI | 21.2% | 87.5% | — | — | — |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 75.0% | — | — | — | 66.7% |
| Aider Polyglot | 71.4% | — | — | — | 59.1% |
| WeirdML | 41.6% | — | 41.2% | — | 36.7% |
| ALE-Bench | 804.1 | — | 461.4 | 340.8 | 267.1 |
| LMArena Text | 1421.4 | 1437.8 | 1387.6 | 1424.1 | 1418.6 |
| Compare head to head | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
Scores aggregated from public benchmark sources (Epoch AI: 11 boards, Arena: 1 board, TIGER-Lab: 1 board) — each linked from the benchmark pages. llmrun does not run these benchmarks. Percentiles and ranks are among open models in the llmrun catalogue; the median and leader marks refer to the same field.