MiniMax M2.7 — Benchmarks
Benchmark scores for MiniMax M2.7 aggregated from public leaderboards (9 boards), with how it ranks among open models and how it compares with its nearest neighbours. See hardware requirements for what you need to run it.
- #34 of 100 open models
- 9 boards · updated Oct 2026
- 100 = average open model
- Hardware requirements →
MiniMax M2.7 reasoning benchmarks
Multi-step logic and problem-solving — can the model think through a hard problem rather than recall an answer.
MiniMax M2.7 coding benchmarks
Writing, editing, and fixing real code — measured by whether the resulting program actually runs and passes tests.
45.1%
45.1%
median 31.7%open leader 52.4%
Overall best: GPT 5.5 (unspecified) 84.7%
93rd percentile · #2 of 16 open · #28 of 57 all
Lab-reportedEpoch AI ·
50.1%
50.1%
median 38.7%open leader 60.9%
Overall best: Claude Opus 5.5 Max 66.9%
85th percentile · #11 of 66 open · #107 of 207 all
Lab-reportedEpoch AI ·
37.0%
37.0%
median 39.5%open leader 82.6%
Overall best: GPT 6 Astra Promax 93.6%
36th percentile · #30 of 46 open · #124 of 162 all
IndependentEpoch AI ·
599.3
599.3
median 694.1open leader 1524.5
Overall best: GPT 6 Astra Max 2951.3
38th percentile · #27 of 43 open · #94 of 122 all
Lab-reportedEpoch AI ·
13.3%
13.3%
median 18.1%open leader 18.4%
Overall best: Claude Mythos Preview Early 73.8%
lowest · #3 of 3 open · #9 of 9 all
Lab-reportedEpoch AI ·
Other results (1)· leaderboard-only, not part of the llmrun Score
1398.7
1398.7
median 1411.4open leader 1655.2
Overall best: Claude Opus 5.5 (Max) 1807.3
45th percentile · #29 of 52 open · #91 of 138 all
ArenaArena ·
MiniMax M2.7 math benchmarks
Symbolic and quantitative problem-solving, from competition math to multi-step calculation.
3.0%
3.0%
median 17.0%open leader 87.0%
Overall best: Claude Fable 5.1 Max 100.0%
16th percentile · #22 of 26 open · #78 of 82 all
Lab-reportedEpoch AI ·
MiniMax M2.7 instruction following benchmarks
How precisely a model obeys explicit, verifiable instructions — format, length, and content constraints — and, more broadly, how much people prefer its responses head-to-head in blind human voting.
1415.0
1415.0
median 1321.5open leader 1487.1
Overall best: Gemini 4 Argon (High) 1523.9
79th percentile · #40 of 187 open · #134 of 405 all
ArenaArena ·
Score vs VRAM in the ≤192 GB tier
- MiniMax M2.7
- Other models
- Best Score for its VRAM
#17 of 78 that fit ≤192 GB
Each dot is a model at the best quant that fits ≤192 GB. The line joins the models with the best Score for their VRAM; a dot below it is beaten by a model that needs no more memory.
Full ≤192 GB ranking →MiniMax M2.7 vs its neighbours
Same boards for the nearest open models per llmrun Score. The highest score in each row is marked.
| Board | MiniMax M2.7this model | Qwen3.8 27Bbest in classQ4_K_M · 18 GB | MiMo V2.5nearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 188 GB | Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507nearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 143 GB | MiniMax M2.1nearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 140 GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| llmrun Score | 107.4 | 122.1 | 108.3 | 108.2 | 106.2 |
| CritPt | 0.6% | 5.4% | 3.7% | 0.0% | — |
| Terminal-Bench | 45.1% | — | — | — | 36.6% |
| SciCode | 50.1% | 46.6% | 43.1% | 41.4% | — |
| WeirdML | 37.0% | — | — | 41.0% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 599.3 | — | 514.0 | — | 623.8 |
| ProofBench | 3.0% | 16.0% | 16.0% | — | — |
| LMArena Text | 1415.0 | 1437.8 | 1433.8 | 1399.8 | 1384.4 |
| Compare head to head | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
Scores aggregated from public benchmark sources (Epoch AI: 7 boards, Arena: 2 boards) — each linked from the benchmark pages. llmrun does not run these benchmarks. Percentiles and ranks are among open models in the llmrun catalogue; the median and leader marks refer to the same field.