llmrun

MiniMax M2.7 — Benchmarks

Benchmark scores for MiniMax M2.7 aggregated from public leaderboards (9 boards), with how it ranks among open models and how it compares with its nearest neighbours. See hardware requirements for what you need to run it.

llmrun Composite Score →

107.4

90% range 102.0–112.7 · from 7 boards

MiniMax M2.7 reasoning benchmarks

Multi-step logic and problem-solving — can the model think through a hard problem rather than recall an answer.

  • CritPt

    0.6%

    median 1.1%open leader 26.6%

    Overall best: GPT 5.6 Sol Max 32.3%

    42nd percentile · #38 of 66 open · #167 of 219 all

    Lab-reported

    Epoch AI ·

MiniMax M2.7 coding benchmarks

Writing, editing, and fixing real code — measured by whether the resulting program actually runs and passes tests.

  • Terminal-Bench

    45.1%

    median 31.7%open leader 52.4%

    Overall best: GPT 5.5 (unspecified) 84.7%

    93rd percentile · #2 of 16 open · #28 of 57 all

    Lab-reported

    Epoch AI ·

  • SciCode

    50.1%

    median 38.7%open leader 60.9%

    Overall best: Claude Opus 5.5 Max 66.9%

    85th percentile · #11 of 66 open · #107 of 207 all

    Lab-reported

    Epoch AI ·

  • WeirdML

    37.0%

    median 39.5%open leader 82.6%

    Overall best: GPT 6 Astra Promax 93.6%

    36th percentile · #30 of 46 open · #124 of 162 all

    Independent

    Epoch AI ·

  • ALE-Bench

    599.3

    median 694.1open leader 1524.5

    Overall best: GPT 6 Astra Max 2951.3

    38th percentile · #27 of 43 open · #94 of 122 all

    Lab-reported

    Epoch AI ·

  • ExploitBench

    13.3%

    median 18.1%open leader 18.4%

    Overall best: Claude Mythos Preview Early 73.8%

    lowest · #3 of 3 open · #9 of 9 all

    Lab-reported

    Epoch AI ·

Other results (1)leaderboard-only, not part of the llmrun Score
  • LMArena WebDev

    1398.7

    median 1411.4open leader 1655.2

    Overall best: Claude Opus 5.5 (Max) 1807.3

    45th percentile · #29 of 52 open · #91 of 138 all

    Arena

    Arena ·

MiniMax M2.7 math benchmarks

Symbolic and quantitative problem-solving, from competition math to multi-step calculation.

  • ProofBench

    3.0%

    median 17.0%open leader 87.0%

    Overall best: Claude Fable 5.1 Max 100.0%

    16th percentile · #22 of 26 open · #78 of 82 all

    Lab-reported

    Epoch AI ·

MiniMax M2.7 instruction following benchmarks

How precisely a model obeys explicit, verifiable instructions — format, length, and content constraints — and, more broadly, how much people prefer its responses head-to-head in blind human voting.

  • LMArena Text

    1415.0

    median 1321.5open leader 1487.1

    Overall best: Gemini 4 Argon (High) 1523.9

    79th percentile · #40 of 187 open · #134 of 405 all

    Arena

    Arena ·

Score vs VRAM in the ≤192 GB tier

  • MiniMax M2.7
  • Other models
  • Best Score for its VRAM

#17 of 78 that fit ≤192 GB

Each dot is a model at the best quant that fits ≤192 GB. The line joins the models with the best Score for their VRAM; a dot below it is beaten by a model that needs no more memory.

Full ≤192 GB ranking →

MiniMax M2.7 vs its neighbours

Same boards for the nearest open models per llmrun Score. The highest score in each row is marked.

BoardMiniMax M2.7this modelQwen3.8 27Bbest in classQ4_K_M · 18 GBMiMo V2.5nearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 188 GBQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507nearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 143 GBMiniMax M2.1nearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 140 GB
llmrun Score107.4122.1108.3108.2106.2
CritPt0.6%5.4%3.7%0.0%—
Terminal-Bench45.1%———36.6%
SciCode50.1%46.6%43.1%41.4%—
WeirdML37.0%——41.0%—
ALE-Bench599.3—514.0—623.8
ProofBench3.0%16.0%16.0%——
LMArena Text1415.01437.81433.81399.81384.4
Compare head to headCompareCompareCompareCompare

Scores aggregated from public benchmark sources (Epoch AI: 7 boards, Arena: 2 boards) — each linked from the benchmark pages. llmrun does not run these benchmarks. Percentiles and ranks are among open models in the llmrun catalogue; the median and leader marks refer to the same field.