llmrun

Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 — Benchmarks

Benchmark scores for Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 aggregated from public leaderboards (7 boards), with how it ranks among open models and how it compares with its nearest neighbours. See hardware requirements for what you need to run it.

llmrun Composite Score →

102.7

90% range 98.6–106.8 · from 6 boards

Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 reasoning benchmarks

Multi-step logic and problem-solving — can the model think through a hard problem rather than recall an answer.

  • Fiction.LiveBench

    66.7%

    median 61.1%open leader 86.1%

    Overall best: GPT 5 (Aug 07, 2025, medium) 97.2%

    63rd percentile · #10 of 25 open · #26 of 58 all

    Independent

    Epoch AI ·

  • ForecastBench

    62.7

    median 61.5open leader 64.7

    Overall best: GPT 5.5 (high) 67.0

    83rd percentile · #5 of 24 open · #57 of 92 all

    Lab-reported

    Epoch AI ·

Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 coding benchmarks

Writing, editing, and fixing real code — measured by whether the resulting program actually runs and passes tests.

  • SWE-bench Verified

    71.2%

    median 62.2%open leader 75.8%

    Overall best: live-SWE-agent + Claude 4.5 Opus medium (20251101) 79.2%

    89th percentile · #3 of 20 open · #33 of 162 all

    Independent

    SWE-bench ·

  • Aider Polyglot

    59.1%

    median 45.1%open leader 74.2%

    Overall best: GPT 5 (Aug 07, 2025, high) 88.0%

    74th percentile · #6 of 18 open · #30 of 69 all

    Independent

    Epoch AI ·

  • WeirdML

    36.7%

    median 39.5%open leader 82.6%

    Overall best: GPT 6 Astra Promax 93.6%

    33rd percentile · #32 of 47 open · #125 of 162 all

    Independent

    Epoch AI ·

  • ALE-Bench

    267.1

    median 754.6open leader 1932.8

    Overall best: GPT 6 Astra Max 2951.3

    6th percentile · #45 of 48 open · #122 of 129 all

    Lab-reported

    Epoch AI ·

Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 instruction following benchmarks

How precisely a model obeys explicit, verifiable instructions — format, length, and content constraints — and, more broadly, how much people prefer its responses head-to-head in blind human voting.

  • LMArena Text

    1418.5

    median 1321.4open leader 1488.2

    Overall best: Gemini 4 Carbon (High) 1527.5

    82nd percentile · #35 of 188 open · #129 of 408 all

    Arena

    Arena ·

Score vs VRAM in the ≤640 GB tier

  • Kimi K2 Instruct 0905
  • Other models
  • Best Score for its VRAM

#47 of 102 that fit ≤640 GB

Each dot is a model at the best quant that fits ≤640 GB. The line steps up to the best Score available at each amount of VRAM; a dot below it is beaten by a model that needs no more memory.

Full ≤640 GB ranking →

Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 vs its neighbours

Same boards for the nearest open models per llmrun Score. The highest score in each row is marked.

BoardKimi K2 Instruct 0905this modelQwen3.8 27Bbest in classQ4_K_M · 18 GBDeepSeek R1 0528nearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 412 GBDeepSeek V3.1nearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 412 GBKimi K2 Instructnearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 617 GB
llmrun Score102.7122.0103.7100.2100.1
Fiction.LiveBench66.7%—75.0%52.8%61.1%
ForecastBench62.7——60.762.2
SWE-bench Verified71.2%———65.4%
Aider Polyglot59.1%—71.4%—59.1%
WeirdML36.7%—41.6%38.4%39.4%
ALE-Bench267.1—804.1——
LMArena Text1418.51435.61421.51416.91417.8
Compare head to headCompareCompareCompareCompare

Scores aggregated from public benchmark sources (Epoch AI: 5 boards, Arena: 1 board, SWE-bench: 1 board) — each linked from the benchmark pages. llmrun does not run these benchmarks. Percentiles and ranks are among open models in the llmrun catalogue; the median and leader marks refer to the same field.