Kimi K2 Thinking — Benchmarks
Benchmark scores for Kimi K2 Thinking aggregated from public leaderboards (11 boards), with how it ranks among open models and how it compares with its nearest neighbours. See hardware requirements for what you need to run it.
- #31 of 100 open models
- 11 boards · updated Oct 2026
- 100 = average open model
- Hardware requirements →
Kimi K2 Thinking reasoning benchmarks
Multi-step logic and problem-solving — can the model think through a hard problem rather than recall an answer.
84.2%
84.2%
median 54.0%open leader 93.1%
Overall best: Gemini 4 Argon (high) 96.4%
78th percentile · #22 of 98 open · #97 of 300 all
IndependentEpoch AI ·
17.6%
17.6%
median 15.9%open leader 19.3%
Overall best: GPT 5.4 (Mar 05, 2026, xhigh) 27.9%
67th percentile · #3 of 7 open · #15 of 22 all
Lab-reportedEpoch AI ·
Kimi K2 Thinking coding benchmarks
Writing, editing, and fixing real code — measured by whether the resulting program actually runs and passes tests.
63.4%
63.4%
median 62.2%open leader 75.8%
Overall best: live-SWE-agent + Claude 4.5 Opus medium (20251101) 79.2%
53rd percentile · #10 of 20 open · #67 of 162 all
Independent35.7%
35.7%
median 31.7%open leader 52.4%
Overall best: GPT 5.5 (unspecified) 84.7%
60th percentile · #7 of 16 open · #37 of 57 all
Lab-reportedEpoch AI ·
63.4%
63.4%
median 55.4%open leader
Overall best: Claude 4.5 Opus (high reasoning) 76.8%
top · #1 of 9 open · #24 of 48 all
Independent42.8%
42.8%
median 39.5%open leader 82.6%
Overall best: GPT 6 Astra Promax 93.6%
64th percentile · #17 of 46 open · #96 of 162 all
IndependentEpoch AI ·
597.5
597.5
median 694.1open leader 1524.5
Overall best: GPT 6 Astra Max 2951.3
36th percentile · #28 of 43 open · #95 of 122 all
Lab-reportedEpoch AI ·
Other results (2)· leaderboard-only, not part of the llmrun Score
Kimi K2 Thinking math benchmarks
Symbolic and quantitative problem-solving, from competition math to multi-step calculation.
83.1%
83.1%
median 52.8%open leader 98.6%
Overall best: Claude Fable 5 (high) 100.0%
74th percentile · #23 of 86 open · #108 of 283 all
IndependentEpoch AI ·
Kimi K2 Thinking instruction following benchmarks
How precisely a model obeys explicit, verifiable instructions — format, length, and content constraints — and, more broadly, how much people prefer its responses head-to-head in blind human voting.
1430.1
1430.1
median 1321.5open leader 1487.1
Overall best: Gemini 4 Argon (High) 1523.9
87th percentile · #25 of 187 open · #113 of 405 all
ArenaArena ·
Score vs VRAM in the ≤640 GB tier
- Kimi K2 Thinking
- Other models
- Best Score for its VRAM
#28 of 96 that fit ≤640 GB
Each dot is a model at the best quant that fits ≤640 GB. The line joins the models with the best Score for their VRAM; a dot below it is beaten by a model that needs no more memory.
Full ≤640 GB ranking →Kimi K2 Thinking vs its neighbours
Same boards for the nearest open models per llmrun Score. The highest score in each row is marked.
| Board | Kimi K2 Thinkingthis model | Qwen3.8 27Bbest in classQ4_K_M · 18 GB | NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16nearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 378 GB | DeepSeek V3.2 Expnearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 413 GB | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminusnearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 412 GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| llmrun Score | 108.6 | 122.1 | 109.9 | 109.0 | 107.3 |
| GPQA Diamond | 84.2% | — | 85.4% | — | — |
| CL-bench | 17.6% | — | — | 13.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 42.8% | — | 43.5% | 39.5% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 597.5 | — | — | — | 745.2 |
| AIME 2024/2025 | 83.1% | — | 86.7% | — | — |
| LMArena Text | 1430.1 | 1437.8 | 1426.0 | 1425.1 | 1416.1 |
| Compare head to head | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
Scores aggregated from public benchmark sources (Epoch AI: 7 boards, Arena: 2 boards, SWE-bench: 2 boards) — each linked from the benchmark pages. llmrun does not run these benchmarks. Percentiles and ranks are among open models in the llmrun catalogue; the median and leader marks refer to the same field.