llmrun

Kimi K2 Thinking — Benchmarks

Benchmark scores for Kimi K2 Thinking aggregated from public leaderboards (11 boards), with how it ranks among open models and how it compares with its nearest neighbours. See hardware requirements for what you need to run it.

llmrun Composite Score →

108.6

90% range 105.2–112.1 · from 8 boards

Kimi K2 Thinking reasoning benchmarks

Multi-step logic and problem-solving — can the model think through a hard problem rather than recall an answer.

  • GPQA Diamond

    84.2%

    median 54.0%open leader 93.1%

    Overall best: Gemini 4 Argon (high) 96.4%

    78th percentile · #22 of 98 open · #97 of 300 all

    Independent

    Epoch AI ·

  • CL-bench

    17.6%

    median 15.9%open leader 19.3%

    Overall best: GPT 5.4 (Mar 05, 2026, xhigh) 27.9%

    67th percentile · #3 of 7 open · #15 of 22 all

    Lab-reported

    Epoch AI ·

Kimi K2 Thinking coding benchmarks

Writing, editing, and fixing real code — measured by whether the resulting program actually runs and passes tests.

  • SWE-bench Verified

    63.4%

    median 62.2%open leader 75.8%

    Overall best: live-SWE-agent + Claude 4.5 Opus medium (20251101) 79.2%

    53rd percentile · #10 of 20 open · #67 of 162 all

    Independent

    SWE-bench ·

  • Terminal-Bench

    35.7%

    median 31.7%open leader 52.4%

    Overall best: GPT 5.5 (unspecified) 84.7%

    60th percentile · #7 of 16 open · #37 of 57 all

    Lab-reported

    Epoch AI ·

  • SWE-bench Bash Only

    63.4%

    median 55.4%open leader

    Overall best: Claude 4.5 Opus (high reasoning) 76.8%

    top · #1 of 9 open · #24 of 48 all

    Independent

    SWE-bench ·

  • WeirdML

    42.8%

    median 39.5%open leader 82.6%

    Overall best: GPT 6 Astra Promax 93.6%

    64th percentile · #17 of 46 open · #96 of 162 all

    Independent

    Epoch AI ·

  • ALE-Bench

    597.5

    median 694.1open leader 1524.5

    Overall best: GPT 6 Astra Max 2951.3

    36th percentile · #28 of 43 open · #95 of 122 all

    Lab-reported

    Epoch AI ·

Other results (2)leaderboard-only, not part of the llmrun Score
  • LMArena WebDev

    1322.1

    median 1411.4open leader 1655.2

    Overall best: Claude Opus 5.5 (Max) 1807.3

    20th percentile · #42 of 52 open · #117 of 138 all

    Arena

    Arena ·

  • METR Time Horizons

    59.2%

    median 49.6%open leader

    Overall best: Claude Mythos Preview Early 85.2%

    top · #1 of 9 open · #24 of 46 all

    Lab-reported

    Epoch AI ·

Kimi K2 Thinking math benchmarks

Symbolic and quantitative problem-solving, from competition math to multi-step calculation.

  • AIME 2024/2025

    83.1%

    median 52.8%open leader 98.6%

    Overall best: Claude Fable 5 (high) 100.0%

    74th percentile · #23 of 86 open · #108 of 283 all

    Independent

    Epoch AI ·

Kimi K2 Thinking instruction following benchmarks

How precisely a model obeys explicit, verifiable instructions — format, length, and content constraints — and, more broadly, how much people prefer its responses head-to-head in blind human voting.

  • LMArena Text

    1430.1

    median 1321.5open leader 1487.1

    Overall best: Gemini 4 Argon (High) 1523.9

    87th percentile · #25 of 187 open · #113 of 405 all

    Arena

    Arena ·

Score vs VRAM in the ≤640 GB tier

  • Kimi K2 Thinking
  • Other models
  • Best Score for its VRAM

#28 of 96 that fit ≤640 GB

Each dot is a model at the best quant that fits ≤640 GB. The line joins the models with the best Score for their VRAM; a dot below it is beaten by a model that needs no more memory.

Full ≤640 GB ranking →

Kimi K2 Thinking vs its neighbours

Same boards for the nearest open models per llmrun Score. The highest score in each row is marked.

BoardKimi K2 Thinkingthis modelQwen3.8 27Bbest in classQ4_K_M · 18 GBNVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16nearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 378 GBDeepSeek V3.2 Expnearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 413 GBDeepSeek V3.1 Terminusnearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 412 GB
llmrun Score108.6122.1109.9109.0107.3
GPQA Diamond84.2%—85.4%——
CL-bench17.6%——13.2%—
WeirdML42.8%—43.5%39.5%—
ALE-Bench597.5———745.2
AIME 2024/202583.1%—86.7%——
LMArena Text1430.11437.81426.01425.11416.1
Compare head to headCompareCompareCompareCompare

Scores aggregated from public benchmark sources (Epoch AI: 7 boards, Arena: 2 boards, SWE-bench: 2 boards) — each linked from the benchmark pages. llmrun does not run these benchmarks. Percentiles and ranks are among open models in the llmrun catalogue; the median and leader marks refer to the same field.