Inkling Small — Benchmarks
Benchmark scores for Inkling Small aggregated from public leaderboards (13 boards), with how it ranks among open models and how it compares with its nearest neighbours. See hardware requirements for what you need to run it.
- #13 of 100 open models
- 13 boards · updated Oct 2026
- 100 = average open model
- Hardware requirements →
Inkling Small reasoning benchmarks
Multi-step logic and problem-solving — can the model think through a hard problem rather than recall an answer.
88.5%
88.5%
median 54.0%open leader 93.1%
Overall best: Gemini 4 Argon (high) 96.4%
88th percentile · #13 of 98 open · #59 of 300 all
IndependentEpoch AI ·
40.1%
40.1%
median 11.8%open leader 72.9%
Overall best: GPT 6 Astra Max 95.0%
67th percentile · #7 of 19 open · #93 of 222 all
IndependentEpoch AI ·
84.0%
84.0%
median 65.3%open leader 94.5%
Overall best: Claude Fable 5 (xhigh) 98.5%
67th percentile · #7 of 19 open · #91 of 232 all
IndependentEpoch AI ·
8.3%
8.3%
median 1.1%open leader 26.6%
Overall best: GPT 5.6 Sol Max 32.3%
83rd percentile · #12 of 66 open · #115 of 219 all
Lab-reportedEpoch AI ·
6.0%
median 18.0%open leader 43.0%
Overall best: GPT 6 Astra Max 84.0%
6th percentile · #17 of 18 open · #124 of 133 all
IndependentEpoch AI ·
Inkling Small coding benchmarks
Writing, editing, and fixing real code — measured by whether the resulting program actually runs and passes tests.
49.6%
49.6%
median 38.7%open leader 60.9%
Overall best: Claude Opus 5.5 Max 66.9%
80th percentile · #14 of 66 open · #111 of 207 all
Lab-reportedEpoch AI ·
Other results (1)· leaderboard-only, not part of the llmrun Score
1409.1
1409.1
median 1411.4open leader 1655.2
Overall best: Claude Opus 5.5 (Max) 1807.3
49th percentile · #27 of 52 open · #86 of 138 all
ArenaArena ·
Inkling Small math benchmarks
Symbolic and quantitative problem-solving, from competition math to multi-step calculation.
90.0%
90.0%
median 52.8%open leader 98.6%
Overall best: Claude Fable 5 (high) 100.0%
85th percentile · #14 of 86 open · #74 of 283 all
IndependentEpoch AI ·
46.3%
46.3%
median 55.8%open leader 72.2%
Overall best: GPT 6 Astra Max 93.7%
38th percentile · #11 of 17 open · #55 of 114 all
IndependentEpoch AI ·
17.1%
17.1%
median 25.6%open leader 39.0%
Overall best: GPT 6.1 Sol Max 100.0%
29th percentile · #9 of 13 open · #59 of 76 all
IndependentEpoch AI ·
6.0%
6.0%
median 17.0%open leader 87.0%
Overall best: Claude Fable 5.1 Max 100.0%
26th percentile · #19 of 26 open · #72 of 82 all
Lab-reportedEpoch AI ·
Inkling Small knowledge benchmarks
Breadth and depth of factual knowledge across many subjects, paired with the reasoning to apply it.
Inkling Small instruction following benchmarks
How precisely a model obeys explicit, verifiable instructions — format, length, and content constraints — and, more broadly, how much people prefer its responses head-to-head in blind human voting.
1404.0
1404.0
median 1321.5open leader 1487.1
Overall best: Gemini 4 Argon (High) 1523.9
76th percentile · #46 of 187 open · #149 of 405 all
ArenaArena ·
Score vs VRAM in the ≤192 GB tier
- Inkling Small
- Other models
- Best Score for its VRAM
#5 of 78 that fit ≤192 GB
Each dot is a model at the best quant that fits ≤192 GB. The line joins the models with the best Score for their VRAM; a dot below it is beaten by a model that needs no more memory.
Full ≤192 GB ranking →Inkling Small vs its neighbours
Same boards for the nearest open models per llmrun Score. The highest score in each row is marked.
| Board | Inkling Smallthis model | GLM 5.3 Flashnearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 205 GB | Qwen3.8 27Bbest in classQ4_K_M · 18 GB | Qwen3.5 397B A17Bnearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 243 GB | MiniMax M3nearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 258 GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| llmrun Score | 119.6 | 124.2 | 122.1 | 113.0 | 112.5 |
| GPQA Diamond | 88.5% | 90.1% | — | 86.4% | 90.9% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 40.1% | 65.8% | 42.4% | — | — |
| ARC-AGI | 84.0% | 91.0% | 87.5% | — | — |
| CritPt | 8.3% | 15.4% | 5.4% | — | 3.7% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 6.0% | 8.0% | — | 18.0% | 8.0% |
| SciCode | 49.6% | 51.6% | 46.6% | — | 47.1% |
| AIME 2024/2025 | 90.0% | 93.9% | — | 88.9% | 71.1% |
| FrontierMath | 46.3% | 55.8% | — | 31.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 17.1% | 17.1% | — | — | — |
| ProofBench | 6.0% | 21.0% | 16.0% | — | 18.0% |
| LMArena Text | 1404.0 | 1473.8 | 1437.8 | 1441.6 | 1441.3 |
| Compare head to head | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
Scores aggregated from public benchmark sources (Epoch AI: 11 boards, Arena: 2 boards) — each linked from the benchmark pages. llmrun does not run these benchmarks. Percentiles and ranks are among open models in the llmrun catalogue; the median and leader marks refer to the same field.