GLM 5 — Benchmarks
Benchmark scores for GLM 5 aggregated from public leaderboards (16 boards), with how it ranks among open models and how it compares with its nearest neighbours. See hardware requirements for what you need to run it.
- #23 of 100 open models
- 16 boards · updated Oct 2026
- 100 = average open model
- Hardware requirements →
GLM 5 reasoning benchmarks
Multi-step logic and problem-solving — can the model think through a hard problem rather than recall an answer.
87.8%
87.8%
median 54.0%open leader 93.1%
Overall best: Gemini 4 Argon (high) 96.4%
85th percentile · #16 of 98 open · #70 of 300 all
IndependentEpoch AI ·
4.9%
4.9%
median 11.8%open leader 72.9%
Overall best: GPT 6 Astra Max 95.0%
42nd percentile · #12 of 19 open · #145 of 222 all
IndependentEpoch AI ·
44.7%
44.7%
median 65.3%open leader 94.5%
Overall best: Claude Fable 5 (xhigh) 98.5%
33rd percentile · #13 of 19 open · #146 of 232 all
IndependentEpoch AI ·
53.2%
53.2%
median 40.8%open leader 61.1%
Overall best: Claude Fable 5 Max 81.9%
79th percentile · #6 of 25 open · #46 of 101 all
IndependentEpoch AI ·
18.7%
18.7%
median 15.9%open leader 19.3%
Overall best: GPT 5.4 (Mar 05, 2026, xhigh) 27.9%
83rd percentile · #2 of 7 open · #11 of 22 all
Lab-reportedEpoch AI ·
61.0
61.0
median 58.1open leader 61.9
Overall best: O3 (Apr 16, 2025, unspecified) 62.5
92nd percentile · #3 of 26 open · #19 of 82 all
Lab-reportedEpoch AI ·
4432.1
4432.1
median 2376.8open leader 8313.8
Overall best: GPT 6 Astra (unspecified) 15514.7
63rd percentile · #7 of 17 open · #38 of 69 all
Lab-reportedEpoch AI ·
GLM 5 coding benchmarks
Writing, editing, and fixing real code — measured by whether the resulting program actually runs and passes tests.
72.8%
72.8%
median 62.2%open leader 75.8%
Overall best: live-SWE-agent + Claude 4.5 Opus medium (20251101) 79.2%
95th percentile · #2 of 20 open · #27 of 162 all
Independent52.4%
52.4%
median 31.7%open leader
Overall best: GPT 5.5 (unspecified) 84.7%
top · #1 of 16 open · #22 of 57 all
Lab-reportedEpoch AI ·
69.7%
median 67.8%open leader
Overall best: Gemini 3 Flash 72.7%
top · #1 of 4 open · #4 of 13 all
Independent48.2%
48.2%
median 39.5%open leader 82.6%
Overall best: GPT 6 Astra Promax 93.6%
77th percentile · #12 of 46 open · #75 of 162 all
IndependentEpoch AI ·
765.6
765.6
median 694.1open leader 1524.5
Overall best: GPT 6 Astra Max 2951.3
57th percentile · #19 of 43 open · #76 of 122 all
Lab-reportedEpoch AI ·
Other results (1)· leaderboard-only, not part of the llmrun Score
1435.4
1435.4
median 1411.4open leader 1655.2
Overall best: Claude Opus 5.5 (Max) 1807.3
55th percentile · #24 of 52 open · #80 of 138 all
ArenaArena ·
GLM 5 math benchmarks
Symbolic and quantitative problem-solving, from competition math to multi-step calculation.
80.0%
80.0%
median 52.8%open leader 98.6%
Overall best: Claude Fable 5 (high) 100.0%
72nd percentile · #25 of 86 open · #120 of 283 all
IndependentEpoch AI ·
GLM 5 knowledge benchmarks
Breadth and depth of factual knowledge across many subjects, paired with the reasoning to apply it.
GLM 5 instruction following benchmarks
How precisely a model obeys explicit, verifiable instructions — format, length, and content constraints — and, more broadly, how much people prefer its responses head-to-head in blind human voting.
1457.3
1457.3
median 1321.5open leader 1487.1
Overall best: Gemini 4 Argon (High) 1523.9
94th percentile · #12 of 187 open · #65 of 405 all
ArenaArena ·
Score vs VRAM in the ≤512 GB tier
- GLM 5
- Other models
- Best Score for its VRAM
#20 of 96 that fit ≤512 GB
Each dot is a model at the best quant that fits ≤512 GB. The line joins the models with the best Score for their VRAM; a dot below it is beaten by a model that needs no more memory.
Full ≤512 GB ranking →GLM 5 vs its neighbours
Same boards for the nearest open models per llmrun Score. The highest score in each row is marked.
| Board | GLM 5this model | Qwen3.8 27Bbest in classQ4_K_M · 18 GB | Qwen3.5 397B A17Bnearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 243 GB | MiniMax M3nearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 258 GB | DeepSeek V3.2nearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 413 GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| llmrun Score | 111.6 | 122.1 | 113.0 | 112.5 | 110.4 |
| GPQA Diamond | 87.8% | — | 86.4% | 90.9% | — |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.9% | 42.4% | — | — | 4.0% |
| ARC-AGI | 44.7% | 87.5% | — | — | 57.0% |
| SimpleBench | 53.2% | — | — | 45.8% | — |
| CL-bench | 18.7% | — | — | — | 12.4% |
| ForecastBench | 61.0 | — | — | 61.3 | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 4432.1 | — | — | 2157.8 | — |
| SWE-bench Verified | 72.8% | — | — | — | 70.0% |
| Terminal-Bench | 52.4% | — | — | — | 39.6% |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 69.7% | — | — | — | 59.0% |
| ALE-Bench | 765.6 | — | — | 640.0 | — |
| AIME 2024/2025 | 80.0% | — | 88.9% | 71.1% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 86.0% | — | 87.8% | — | 85.0% |
| LMArena Text | 1457.3 | 1437.8 | 1441.6 | 1441.3 | 1424.6 |
| Compare head to head | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
Scores aggregated from public benchmark sources (Epoch AI: 11 boards, Arena: 2 boards, SWE-bench: 2 boards, TIGER-Lab: 1 board) — each linked from the benchmark pages. llmrun does not run these benchmarks. Percentiles and ranks are among open models in the llmrun catalogue; the median and leader marks refer to the same field.