Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct — Benchmarks
Benchmark scores for Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct aggregated from public leaderboards (17 boards), with how it ranks among open models and how it compares with its nearest neighbours. See hardware requirements for what you need to run it.
- #78 of 106 open models
- 17 boards · updated Nov 2026
- 100 = average open model
- Hardware requirements →
Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct reasoning benchmarks
Multi-step logic and problem-solving — can the model think through a hard problem rather than recall an answer.
67.0%
67.0%
median 55.7%open leader 93.2%
Overall best: Gemini 4 Argon (high) 96.4%
63rd percentile · #38 of 100 open · #192 of 309 all
IndependentEpoch AI ·
0.0%
0.0%
median 23.1%open leader 78.1%
Overall best: GPT 6 Astra Max 95.0%
5th percentile · #20 of 22 open · #233 of 236 all
IndependentEpoch AI ·
4.4%
4.4%
median 75.5%open leader 94.5%
Overall best: Claude Fable 5 (xhigh) 98.5%
5th percentile · #21 of 22 open · #243 of 248 all
IndependentEpoch AI ·
27.7%
27.7%
median 40.8%open leader 61.1%
Overall best: Claude Fable 5 Max 81.9%
33rd percentile · #17 of 25 open · #82 of 101 all
IndependentEpoch AI ·
0.0%
0.0%
median 0.9%open leader 26.6%
Overall best: Gemini 4 Carbon (high) 36.0%
19th percentile · #67 of 84 open · #221 of 244 all
Lab-reportedEpoch AI ·
61.9%
61.9%
median 68.7%open leader 93.9%
Overall best: Claude Opus 5.5 Max 98.9%
39th percentile · #43 of 70 open · #183 of 235 all
Lab-reportedEpoch AI ·
46.2%
46.2%
median 61.1%open leader 86.1%
Overall best: GPT 5 (Aug 07, 2025, medium) 97.2%
25th percentile · #19 of 25 open · #48 of 58 all
IndependentEpoch AI ·
15.9%
15.9%
median 25.5%open leader 55.5%
Overall best: Claude Sonnet 5.5 Max 68.3%
27th percentile · #41 of 56 open · #173 of 197 all
Lab-reportedEpoch AI ·
Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct coding benchmarks
Writing, editing, and fixing real code — measured by whether the resulting program actually runs and passes tests.
15.6%
15.6%
median 45.1%open leader 74.2%
Overall best: GPT 5 (Aug 07, 2025, high) 88.0%
18th percentile · #15 of 18 open · #62 of 69 all
IndependentEpoch AI ·
31.7%
31.7%
median 40.1%open leader 60.9%
Overall best: Claude Opus 5.5 Max 66.9%
21st percentile · #57 of 72 open · #198 of 217 all
Lab-reportedEpoch AI ·
24.5%
24.5%
median 39.5%open leader 82.6%
Overall best: GPT 6 Astra Promax 93.6%
15th percentile · #40 of 47 open · #144 of 162 all
IndependentEpoch AI ·
173.0
173.0
median 754.6open leader 1932.8
Overall best: GPT 6 Astra Max 2951.3
lowest · #48 of 48 open · #128 of 129 all
Lab-reportedEpoch AI ·
Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct math benchmarks
Symbolic and quantitative problem-solving, from competition math to multi-step calculation.
20.6%
20.6%
median 54.4%open leader 99.4%
Overall best: Claude Fable 5 (high) 100.0%
37th percentile · #56 of 88 open · #234 of 292 all
IndependentEpoch AI ·
73.0%
73.0%
median 41.6%open leader 96.6%
Overall best: GPT 5 (Aug 07, 2025, high) 98.1%
84th percentile · #7 of 39 open · #42 of 107 all
IndependentEpoch AI ·
Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct knowledge benchmarks
Breadth and depth of factual knowledge across many subjects, paired with the reasoning to apply it.
Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct instruction following benchmarks
How precisely a model obeys explicit, verifiable instructions — format, length, and content constraints — and, more broadly, how much people prefer its responses head-to-head in blind human voting.
1327.0
1327.0
median 1321.4open leader 1488.2
Overall best: Gemini 4 Carbon (High) 1527.5
52nd percentile · #90 of 188 open · #242 of 408 all
ArenaArena ·
Score vs VRAM in the ≤512 GB tier
- Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct
- Other models
- Best Score for its VRAM
#74 of 102 that fit ≤512 GB
Each dot is a model at the best quant that fits ≤512 GB. The line steps up to the best Score available at each amount of VRAM; a dot below it is beaten by a model that needs no more memory.
Full ≤512 GB ranking →Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct vs its neighbours
Same boards for the nearest open models per llmrun Score. The highest score in each row is marked.
| Board | Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instructthis model | Qwen3.8 27Bbest in classQ4_K_M · 18 GB | Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512nearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 454 GB | DeepSeek v3nearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 412 GB | Llama 3.1 405B Instructnearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 276 GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| llmrun Score | 87.1 | 122.0 | 89.6 | 89.0 | 83.5 |
| GPQA Diamond | 67.0% | — | — | 56.5% | 50.9% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.0% | 42.4% | — | — | — |
| ARC-AGI | 4.4% | 87.5% | — | — | — |
| SimpleBench | 27.7% | — | — | 18.9% | 23.0% |
| CritPt | 0.0% | 5.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| DTBench | 61.9% | 88.0% | 65.1% | — | 61.4% |
| LMCA | 15.9% | 41.4% | 16.7% | — | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 15.6% | — | — | 48.4% | — |
| SciCode | 31.7% | 46.6% | 36.6% | 35.8% | — |
| WeirdML | 24.5% | — | — | — | 21.4% |
| ALE-Bench | 173.0 | — | 264.7 | — | — |
| AIME 2024/2025 | 20.6% | — | — | 15.8% | 9.7% |
| MATH Level 5 | 73.0% | — | — | 64.8% | 49.8% |
| MMLU-Pro | 80.5% | — | — | 75.9% | 73.3% |
| LMArena Text | 1327.0 | 1435.6 | 1414.3 | 1358.4 | 1335.5 |
| Compare head to head | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
Scores aggregated from public benchmark sources (Epoch AI: 15 boards, Arena: 1 board, TIGER-Lab: 1 board) — each linked from the benchmark pages. llmrun does not run these benchmarks. Percentiles and ranks are among open models in the llmrun catalogue; the median and leader marks refer to the same field.