llmrun

Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct — Benchmarks

Benchmark scores for Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct aggregated from public leaderboards (17 boards), with how it ranks among open models and how it compares with its nearest neighbours. See hardware requirements for what you need to run it.

llmrun Composite Score →

87.1

90% range 84.1–90.1 · from 15 boards

Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct reasoning benchmarks

Multi-step logic and problem-solving — can the model think through a hard problem rather than recall an answer.

  • GPQA Diamond

    67.0%

    median 55.7%open leader 93.2%

    Overall best: Gemini 4 Argon (high) 96.4%

    63rd percentile · #38 of 100 open · #192 of 309 all

    Independent

    Epoch AI ·

  • ARC-AGI-2

    0.0%

    median 23.1%open leader 78.1%

    Overall best: GPT 6 Astra Max 95.0%

    5th percentile · #20 of 22 open · #233 of 236 all

    Independent

    Epoch AI ·

  • ARC-AGI

    4.4%

    median 75.5%open leader 94.5%

    Overall best: Claude Fable 5 (xhigh) 98.5%

    5th percentile · #21 of 22 open · #243 of 248 all

    Independent

    Epoch AI ·

  • SimpleBench

    27.7%

    median 40.8%open leader 61.1%

    Overall best: Claude Fable 5 Max 81.9%

    33rd percentile · #17 of 25 open · #82 of 101 all

    Independent

    Epoch AI ·

  • CritPt

    0.0%

    median 0.9%open leader 26.6%

    Overall best: Gemini 4 Carbon (high) 36.0%

    19th percentile · #67 of 84 open · #221 of 244 all

    Lab-reported

    Epoch AI ·

  • DTBench

    61.9%

    median 68.7%open leader 93.9%

    Overall best: Claude Opus 5.5 Max 98.9%

    39th percentile · #43 of 70 open · #183 of 235 all

    Lab-reported

    Epoch AI ·

  • Fiction.LiveBench

    46.2%

    median 61.1%open leader 86.1%

    Overall best: GPT 5 (Aug 07, 2025, medium) 97.2%

    25th percentile · #19 of 25 open · #48 of 58 all

    Independent

    Epoch AI ·

  • LMCA

    15.9%

    median 25.5%open leader 55.5%

    Overall best: Claude Sonnet 5.5 Max 68.3%

    27th percentile · #41 of 56 open · #173 of 197 all

    Lab-reported

    Epoch AI ·

Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct coding benchmarks

Writing, editing, and fixing real code — measured by whether the resulting program actually runs and passes tests.

  • Aider Polyglot

    15.6%

    median 45.1%open leader 74.2%

    Overall best: GPT 5 (Aug 07, 2025, high) 88.0%

    18th percentile · #15 of 18 open · #62 of 69 all

    Independent

    Epoch AI ·

  • SciCode

    31.7%

    median 40.1%open leader 60.9%

    Overall best: Claude Opus 5.5 Max 66.9%

    21st percentile · #57 of 72 open · #198 of 217 all

    Lab-reported

    Epoch AI ·

  • WeirdML

    24.5%

    median 39.5%open leader 82.6%

    Overall best: GPT 6 Astra Promax 93.6%

    15th percentile · #40 of 47 open · #144 of 162 all

    Independent

    Epoch AI ·

  • ALE-Bench

    173.0

    median 754.6open leader 1932.8

    Overall best: GPT 6 Astra Max 2951.3

    lowest · #48 of 48 open · #128 of 129 all

    Lab-reported

    Epoch AI ·

Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct math benchmarks

Symbolic and quantitative problem-solving, from competition math to multi-step calculation.

  • AIME 2024/2025

    20.6%

    median 54.4%open leader 99.4%

    Overall best: Claude Fable 5 (high) 100.0%

    37th percentile · #56 of 88 open · #234 of 292 all

    Independent

    Epoch AI ·

  • MATH Level 5

    73.0%

    median 41.6%open leader 96.6%

    Overall best: GPT 5 (Aug 07, 2025, high) 98.1%

    84th percentile · #7 of 39 open · #42 of 107 all

    Independent

    Epoch AI ·

Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct knowledge benchmarks

Breadth and depth of factual knowledge across many subjects, paired with the reasoning to apply it.

  • Humanity's Last Exam

    5.7%

    median 8.2%open leader 24.4%

    Overall best: GPT 6 Astra (unspecified) 54.8%

    lowest · #4 of 4 open · #43 of 51 all

    Lab-reported

    Epoch AI ·

  • MMLU-Pro

    80.5%

    median 52.0%open leader 88.0%

    Overall best: Gemini-3.1-Pro 91.2%

    84th percentile · #24 of 146 open · #62 of 257 all

    Independent

    TIGER-Lab

Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct instruction following benchmarks

How precisely a model obeys explicit, verifiable instructions — format, length, and content constraints — and, more broadly, how much people prefer its responses head-to-head in blind human voting.

  • LMArena Text

    1327.0

    median 1321.4open leader 1488.2

    Overall best: Gemini 4 Carbon (High) 1527.5

    52nd percentile · #90 of 188 open · #242 of 408 all

    Arena

    Arena ·

Score vs VRAM in the ≤512 GB tier

  • Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct
  • Other models
  • Best Score for its VRAM

#74 of 102 that fit ≤512 GB

Each dot is a model at the best quant that fits ≤512 GB. The line steps up to the best Score available at each amount of VRAM; a dot below it is beaten by a model that needs no more memory.

Full ≤512 GB ranking →

Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct vs its neighbours

Same boards for the nearest open models per llmrun Score. The highest score in each row is marked.

BoardLlama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instructthis modelQwen3.8 27Bbest in classQ4_K_M · 18 GBMistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512nearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 454 GBDeepSeek v3nearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 412 GBLlama 3.1 405B Instructnearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 276 GB
llmrun Score87.1122.089.689.083.5
GPQA Diamond67.0%——56.5%50.9%
ARC-AGI-20.0%42.4%———
ARC-AGI4.4%87.5%———
SimpleBench27.7%——18.9%23.0%
CritPt0.0%5.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%
DTBench61.9%88.0%65.1%—61.4%
LMCA15.9%41.4%16.7%——
Aider Polyglot15.6%——48.4%—
SciCode31.7%46.6%36.6%35.8%—
WeirdML24.5%———21.4%
ALE-Bench173.0—264.7——
AIME 2024/202520.6%——15.8%9.7%
MATH Level 573.0%——64.8%49.8%
MMLU-Pro80.5%——75.9%73.3%
LMArena Text1327.01435.61414.31358.41335.5
Compare head to headCompareCompareCompareCompare

Scores aggregated from public benchmark sources (Epoch AI: 15 boards, Arena: 1 board, TIGER-Lab: 1 board) — each linked from the benchmark pages. llmrun does not run these benchmarks. Percentiles and ranks are among open models in the llmrun catalogue; the median and leader marks refer to the same field.