NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 — Benchmarks
Benchmark scores for NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 aggregated from public leaderboards (22 boards), with how it ranks among open models and how it compares with its nearest neighbours. See hardware requirements for what you need to run it.
- #26 of 100 open models
- 22 boards · updated Oct 2026
- 100 = average open model
- Hardware requirements →
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 reasoning benchmarks
Multi-step logic and problem-solving — can the model think through a hard problem rather than recall an answer.
85.4%
85.4%
median 54.0%open leader 93.1%
Overall best: Gemini 4 Argon (high) 96.4%
80th percentile · #20 of 98 open · #90 of 300 all
IndependentEpoch AI ·
74.7
median 82.7open leader 90.7
Overall best: GPT 6 Astra Max 92.7
17th percentile · #16 of 19 open · #64 of 70 all
Independent22.7%
22.7%
median 40.2%open leader 59.5%
Overall best: Gemini 4 Argon (unspecified) 82.4%
13th percentile · #14 of 16 open · #52 of 54 all
Lab-reportedEpoch AI ·
3.1%
3.1%
median 1.1%open leader 26.6%
Overall best: GPT 5.6 Sol Max 32.3%
66th percentile · #24 of 66 open · #139 of 219 all
Lab-reportedEpoch AI ·
90.1%
90.1%
median 67.7%open leader 93.9%
Overall best: Claude Opus 5.5 Max 98.9%
91st percentile · #7 of 68 open · #72 of 214 all
Lab-reportedEpoch AI ·
74.7
median 78.8open leader 90.7
Overall best: Gemini 4 Argon 95.1
29th percentile · #11 of 15 open · #43 of 48 all
Independent36.9%
36.9%
median 24.7%open leader 55.5%
Overall best: Claude Opus 5.5 Max 68.2%
77th percentile · #13 of 54 open · #102 of 176 all
Lab-reportedEpoch AI ·
20.0%
20.0%
median 18.0%open leader 43.0%
Overall best: GPT 6 Astra Max 84.0%
65th percentile · #7 of 18 open · #61 of 133 all
IndependentEpoch AI ·
Other results (2)· leaderboard-only, not part of the llmrun Score
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 coding benchmarks
Writing, editing, and fixing real code — measured by whether the resulting program actually runs and passes tests.
70.7
70.7
median 75.0open leader 81.5
Overall best: Claude Sonnet 5.5 Max 91.4
22nd percentile · #15 of 19 open · #63 of 70 all
Independent40.3%
40.3%
median 38.7%open leader 60.9%
Overall best: Claude Opus 5.5 Max 66.9%
57th percentile · #29 of 66 open · #157 of 207 all
Lab-reportedEpoch AI ·
43.5%
43.5%
median 39.5%open leader 82.6%
Overall best: GPT 6 Astra Promax 93.6%
67th percentile · #16 of 46 open · #93 of 162 all
IndependentEpoch AI ·
13.6%
13.6%
median 26.5%open leader 44.2%
Overall best: Claude Opus 5.5 (medium) 54.6%
lowest · #12 of 12 open · #43 of 46 all
Lab-reportedEpoch AI ·
43.6
median 65.5open leader 86.8
Overall best: Claude Fable 5 98.3
14th percentile · #13 of 15 open · #46 of 48 all
Independent11.2
median 27.1open leader 47.5
Overall best: Claude Opus 5.5 85.0
7th percentile · #14 of 15 open · #46 of 48 all
Independent
Other results (1)· leaderboard-only, not part of the llmrun Score
58.6
median 70.7open leader 78.5
Overall best: Claude Opus 5.5 86.9
21st percentile · #12 of 15 open · #45 of 48 all
Independent
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 math benchmarks
Symbolic and quantitative problem-solving, from competition math to multi-step calculation.
86.7%
86.7%
median 52.8%open leader 98.6%
Overall best: Claude Fable 5 (high) 100.0%
79th percentile · #18 of 86 open · #89 of 283 all
IndependentEpoch AI ·
88.7
88.7
median 86.8open leader 95.1
Overall best: Claude Opus 5.5 Max 97.1
72nd percentile · #6 of 19 open · #43 of 70 all
Independent2.0%
2.0%
median 17.0%open leader 87.0%
Overall best: Claude Fable 5.1 Max 100.0%
12th percentile · #23 of 26 open · #79 of 82 all
Lab-reportedEpoch AI ·
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 knowledge benchmarks
Breadth and depth of factual knowledge across many subjects, paired with the reasoning to apply it.
43.2
median 70.1open leader 85.3
Overall best: Claude Opus 5 88.9
7th percentile · #14 of 15 open · #45 of 48 all
Independent
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 instruction following benchmarks
How precisely a model obeys explicit, verifiable instructions — format, length, and content constraints — and, more broadly, how much people prefer its responses head-to-head in blind human voting.
1426.0
1426.0
median 1321.5open leader 1487.1
Overall best: Gemini 4 Argon (High) 1523.9
86th percentile · #27 of 187 open · #118 of 405 all
ArenaArena ·
Score vs VRAM in the ≤512 GB tier
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16
- Other models
- Best Score for its VRAM
#23 of 96 that fit ≤512 GB
Each dot is a model at the best quant that fits ≤512 GB. The line joins the models with the best Score for their VRAM; a dot below it is beaten by a model that needs no more memory.
Full ≤512 GB ranking →NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 vs its neighbours
Same boards for the nearest open models per llmrun Score. The highest score in each row is marked.
| Board | NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16this model | Qwen3.8 27Bbest in classQ4_K_M · 18 GB | DeepSeek V3.2nearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 413 GB | GLM 4.7nearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 218 GB | DeepSeek V3.2 Expnearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 413 GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| llmrun Score | 109.9 | 122.1 | 110.4 | 109.1 | 109.0 |
| GPQA Diamond | 85.4% | — | — | 83.3% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 74.7 | 80.0 | — | — | — |
| APEX-Agents | 22.7% | 47.5% | 21.3% | — | — |
| CritPt | 3.1% | 5.4% | — | 1.7% | 2.9% |
| DTBench | 90.1% | 88.0% | 85.6% | — | 87.7% |
| LiveBench 2026 Reasoning | 74.7 | 80.0 | — | — | — |
| LMCA | 36.9% | 41.4% | 28.8% | — | 29.1% |
| LiveBench Coding | 70.7 | 75.7 | — | — | — |
| SciCode | 40.3% | 46.6% | — | 45.1% | 38.9% |
| WeirdML | 43.5% | — | — | — | 39.5% |
| LiveBench 2026 Coding | 43.6 | 86.8 | — | — | — |
| LiveBench 2026 Long-Horizon | 11.2 | 27.9 | — | — | — |
| AIME 2024/2025 | 86.7% | — | — | 83.3% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 88.7 | 86.2 | — | — | — |
| ProofBench | 2.0% | 16.0% | 8.0% | 6.0% | — |
| LiveBench 2026 Research | 43.2 | 59.4 | — | — | — |
| LMArena Text | 1426.0 | 1437.8 | 1424.6 | 1441.3 | 1425.1 |
| Compare head to head | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
Scores aggregated from public benchmark sources (Epoch AI: 11 boards, LiveBench: 10 boards, Arena: 1 board) — each linked from the benchmark pages. llmrun does not run these benchmarks. Percentiles and ranks are among open models in the llmrun catalogue; the median and leader marks refer to the same field.