llmrun

Qwen3.5 397B A17B — Benchmarks

Benchmark scores for Qwen3.5 397B A17B aggregated from public leaderboards (10 boards), with how it ranks among open models and how it compares with its nearest neighbours. See hardware requirements for what you need to run it.

llmrun Composite Score →

113.0

90% range 109.0–117.0 · from 8 boards

Qwen3.5 397B A17B reasoning benchmarks

Multi-step logic and problem-solving — can the model think through a hard problem rather than recall an answer.

  • GPQA Diamond

    86.4%

    median 54.0%open leader 93.1%

    Overall best: Gemini 4 Argon (high) 96.4%

    82nd percentile · #18 of 98 open · #81 of 300 all

    Independent

    Epoch AI ·

  • APEX-Agents

    24.9%

    median 40.2%open leader 59.5%

    Overall best: Gemini 4 Argon (unspecified) 82.4%

    20th percentile · #13 of 16 open · #51 of 54 all

    Lab-reported

    Epoch AI ·

  • DTBench

    87.5%

    median 67.7%open leader 93.9%

    Overall best: Claude Opus 5.5 Max 98.9%

    83rd percentile · #12 of 68 open · #84 of 214 all

    Lab-reported

    Epoch AI ·

  • LMCA

    37.9%

    median 24.7%open leader 55.5%

    Overall best: Claude Opus 5.5 Max 68.2%

    83rd percentile · #10 of 54 open · #95 of 176 all

    Lab-reported

    Epoch AI ·

  • Mystery Game Puzzles

    18.0%

    median 18.0%open leader 43.0%

    Overall best: GPT 6 Astra Max 84.0%

    50th percentile · #10 of 18 open · #70 of 133 all

    Independent

    Epoch AI ·

Qwen3.5 397B A17B coding benchmarks

Writing, editing, and fixing real code — measured by whether the resulting program actually runs and passes tests.

  • LMArena WebDev

    1400.5

    median 1411.4open leader 1655.2

    Overall best: Claude Opus 5.5 (Max) 1807.3

    47th percentile · #28 of 52 open · #90 of 138 all

    Arena

    Arena ·

Qwen3.5 397B A17B math benchmarks

Symbolic and quantitative problem-solving, from competition math to multi-step calculation.

  • AIME 2024/2025

    88.9%

    median 52.8%open leader 98.6%

    Overall best: Claude Fable 5 (high) 100.0%

    82nd percentile · #16 of 86 open · #80 of 283 all

    Independent

    Epoch AI ·

  • FrontierMath

    31.2%

    median 55.8%open leader 72.2%

    Overall best: GPT 6 Astra Max 93.7%

    6th percentile · #16 of 17 open · #72 of 114 all

    Independent

    Epoch AI ·

Qwen3.5 397B A17B knowledge benchmarks

Breadth and depth of factual knowledge across many subjects, paired with the reasoning to apply it.

  • MMLU-Pro

    87.8%

    median 52.1%open leader 88.0%

    Overall best: Gemini-3.1-Pro 91.2%

    99th percentile · #2 of 145 open · #7 of 257 all

    Independent

    TIGER-Lab

Qwen3.5 397B A17B instruction following benchmarks

How precisely a model obeys explicit, verifiable instructions — format, length, and content constraints — and, more broadly, how much people prefer its responses head-to-head in blind human voting.

  • LMArena Text

    1441.6

    median 1321.5open leader 1487.1

    Overall best: Gemini 4 Argon (High) 1523.9

    91st percentile · #17 of 187 open · #93 of 405 all

    Arena

    Arena ·

Score vs VRAM in the ≤256 GB tier

  • Qwen3.5 397B A17B
  • Other models
  • Best Score for its VRAM

#9 of 84 that fit ≤256 GB

Each dot is a model at the best quant that fits ≤256 GB. The line joins the models with the best Score for their VRAM; a dot below it is beaten by a model that needs no more memory.

Full ≤256 GB ranking →

Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs its neighbours

Same boards for the nearest open models per llmrun Score. The highest score in each row is marked.

BoardQwen3.5 397B A17Bthis modelQwen3.8 27Bbest in classQ4_K_M · 18 GBMiniMax M3nearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 258 GBMiniMax M2.5nearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 140 GBGLM 5nearest by ScoreQ4_K_M · 454 GB
llmrun Score113.0122.1112.5111.8111.6
GPQA Diamond86.4%—90.9%—87.8%
APEX-Agents24.9%47.5%37.7%——
DTBench87.5%88.0%78.9%——
LMCA37.9%41.4%33.7%——
Mystery Game Puzzles18.0%—8.0%——
LMArena WebDev1400.51593.21482.51386.31435.4
AIME 2024/202588.9%—71.1%—80.0%
MMLU-Pro87.8%——80.1%86.0%
LMArena Text1441.61437.81441.31390.61457.3
Compare head to headCompareCompareCompareCompare

Scores aggregated from public benchmark sources (Epoch AI: 7 boards, Arena: 2 boards, TIGER-Lab: 1 board) — each linked from the benchmark pages. llmrun does not run these benchmarks. Percentiles and ranks are among open models in the llmrun catalogue; the median and leader marks refer to the same field.